Dynastic changes? Or change dynasty to changing dynasties!

When dynasty is change, change dynasties. Change is change, and change is good. But what if change is bad? Is changing dynasties a dynasty of good change, or a bad change of change for changing dynasties? When change is bad (or good), a dynasty may change change into dynasty. Change? Indeed, dynasty changes change, and will continue to do so. Yet change also changes dynasties, unless this changes. Change is inevitable, therefore dynasty.

No more dynasties! Change. But a changed dynasty is change! But if there is no change in dynasty, then there is no change, and dynasty remains unchanged. Therefore: change. Aren’t we sick of dynasties? But if a dynasty changes from another dynasty, why can’t a dynasty change back to the old, better dynasty? Ah, but this change is not really change, because good dynasties and bad dynasties are the SAME dynasty. Can a dynasty change, to be both good and bad? Sure, like that ever happens! This dynasty changed for the bad, and a changed dynasty will continue to be bad, due to lack of change. A change that makes no change is no change. Should we prefer a dynastic change in which the only change is to dynasty, or a change which changes dynasty and change, with no guarantee of either?

Contrariwise: what if change doesn’t change? What happens to change without change? Dynasties can form dynasties, but can change change change? Or will things change the change… into a dynasty? Because dynasties never change! Shouldn’t we change dynasties before we try to change change? Isn’t it possible that this dynasty changed things so that dynasties can change things more than change can change things? CHANGE?! HA! DYNASTY!

I have a change for you: Go fuck yourselves. Here’s your dynasty: the Royal House of Fuck You.

Alas, drunk posting is never your friend.

I don’t thin he’s drunk. It’s a little commentary on the Obama-Clinton runoff.

Betty Botter bought a bit of butter. “But,” said she, “this butter’s bitter. If I put it in my batter, It will make my batter bitter. But a bit of better butter- that would make my batter better.” So Betty Botter bought a bit of better butter (better than her bitter butter), and she put it in her bitter batter, and made her bitter batter a bit better.

Suck on that, Kucinich.

Great. Now the word “dynasty” has lost its meaning for my brain.

It’s Saturday. Can’t it be both?

Early campaign fatigue. I needed to vent.

It’s all going to be for nothing, isn’t it? American liberals respond to stress by eating each other.

GOOD. Pass it on. Make ten copies and forward them to ten of your friends. The last person to break this chain contracted dog herpes.

I like to be specific in these matters. What strain of dog herpes was it, and was it spontaneous, or did the victim ever actually come into contact with a dog?

Both. His body spontaneously excreted a dog, which then raped his lips. Canine venereal epidemiologists have tentatively classified this strain as “Should’ve Forwarded The Message-A.”

:eek:

Okeydoke. Already forwarded.