[QUOTE=WhyNot]
[hijack, continued]
Diverse, indeed. The worst part of my worst tattoo was the one on my stomach which simultaneously itched and TICKLED the worst I’ve ever been tickled and I had to lie so still! The ankle was intense, but not bad, and the one on my sternum was psychologically horrific (half-way through I really grokked for the first time that this was going to be very visible to everyone for ever, not something I could cover up without planning and effort - since I was getting it for spiritual reasons relating to my visibility in the community, this was so, so appropriate. Hard, but appropriate.). But the physical pain wasn’t bad, and afterward nothing felt worse than a scraped knee while healing.
I am thinking about trying again with my ears though. The news that (generally) a needle hurts less has me reconsidering my determination to never let another hole be made in my ears!
[/hijack]
As for this furor about “trashy” and “stupid”, I think y’all are being a little hard on some folks here. The fact is, SOMEONE has to be at the bottom of the sociological heap. At this moment, in most places in the US, that group of someones tends to be correlated with the same group(s) of someones that practices routine ear piercing of infants. They’re not “trashy” because they pierce their baby’s ears. They’re “trashy” for whatever fucked up reasons groups of people get labeled trashy - lower income, poor quality schools, higher crime rates, whatever. But the flip side of that cultural identity thing is…well, cultural identity. And if you do something that identifies your baby as a member of a sociologically low-ranked group, it shouldn’t be surprising that people outside that group think of her as sociologically low-ranking. Or, in layman’s terms, “trashy”.
In other words, you’re not just identifying her as part of your group to people within the group, but to people outside the group. And with that identification comes all the baggage of that group.
If I put my daughter in tie-dyed t-shirts and long skirts, people are going to associate that with patchoulli and pot and jam bands. Doesn’t matter if she’s personally into any of that or not - the society with which such things are associated are also associated with tie-dyed t-shirts and long skirts. If you consider hippies “trashy”, even subconsiously, then she’ll look “trashy” to you.
[/QUOTE]
When my dad first taught me the definition of the word ‘class’…he had to use many metaphors and such…because it is a hard concept to grasp.
But he did manage to get the meaning across to me, and to instill me with some semblance of it.
The moment the true meaning of the word dawned on me…I could see straight through “sociological classes”. I could see that some of the people on the top of that heap, sorely lacked the very characteristic they coveted so much. They really didn’t know what it meant. They didn’t have a daddy to take the time to break it down with metaphors and examples…or maybe they had no one to set an example.
I think it is a good idea for those of us that do participate in practices that the majority of the people in this country find “trashy” get the information out that it is not trashy at all. This way, we may shed light on certain individuals that do want to emerge from the sludgy lot of people that find low-income people, people from lower quality schools, etc, to be ‘trashy’.
There is a chance that they may open their eyes, exhibit a modicum of class and say, “who the hell were we to judge them for something as harmless as ear piercing or as irrelevant as income?”