Google books can be goofy with dates. I think for periodicals and other items published in a series, the date that shows up in the results is the earliest date that any item was published. This article metions the Civil War in the past tense, so it would have to be later than 1865 at least.
ETA: and, yeah, I just saw the intro at the top saying 1957. I’m still betting on it being a baseball phrase.
That Google Books result is even screwier than their norm. There are two page 400s. It appears to be two entirely different books accidentally scanned together.