Speaking of short attention spans, you have already been advised that your constant insults are out of line, here. Back off or you are gone.
Not really, I was rebuking your rebuttal. You said more often than not our brains recognize patterns as a survival trait, and I said plasma phenomena are scalable.
What’s sad is that you think you somehow impress me, or anyone else, with your mediocre trash-talk.
Well, you’re right about most of the things you just wrote. The magnetic field on the sun is generated by electric current, and it does have something to do with how the elctrons and protons are accelerated off the surface. (And I’m a mainstream scientist, by the way.)
Now what does that have to do with what the energy source of the sun is? A nulcear power station generates a lot of electricity too, but it’s not powered by “electric energy”.
So, what, it was a deliberate non-sequitur?
Considering your extremely poor judgement and defecient cognitive processes in general, any sort of approval from you would be a giant warning sign that I’m doing something terribly wrong.
'nother words, I ain’t trying to impress you.
Really? I was under the impression that weak force/strong force and electromagnetics had all been unified somehow. Besides, prove it.
So does he recieve a single warning which will be followed up with a ban as well?
Prove what exactly?
I dunno. Nothing I guess. There has to be a relationship between all the forces we know of: strong force, weak force, electromagnetism and gravity. When I say electromagnetism runs the Universe, what I mean to say is that it’s easiest (for me at least) to finally see that big Theory of Everything by looking into electromagnetism. Our planet has a big ass magnetic field, am I to believe that it has nothing to do with the gravity we experience on the ground?
Well yeah, that’s what all “mainstream” scientists are hoping too, and trying to accomplish. Do you actually have anything concrete to offer on this front? Like a model that explains something “mainstream” scientists cannot explain?
No. Now that I have actually seen his post, I will admonish Miller to refrain from direct personal insults, as well.
Miller, stop that.
On the other hand, The Fonz, you have multiple threads in which you have posted multiple taunts and you have already racked up one official Warning.
At this point, on the thread-to-Warning ratio, you are far ahead of Miller.
TheFonz, I have a question for you (and I apologise for this hijacking, but it is relevant). Based on a post in the just-closed Mother Theresa thread of yours (linky), which i’ll quote from;
If i’m reading your this correctly, you’re suggesting that with an increased understanding of the universe will come a respective increase in the evil acts committed in the world. I don’t agree with that, but that’s besides the point to my question.
If we assume you’re correct; isn’t then motivating others to discover the truths about the universe an immoral act, since it will in turn cause evil to spread? In other words, your arguments in this thread (designed to get us to agree with what you consider to be a truth of the universe) are an immoral act under your belief system. Would you agree?
Sorry.
Yeah… 
This is a moral dilemma I’ve been having for a while now. To promote truth, or not to promote truth? I was thinking about Prometheus and his punishment for giving man fire. Not combustion, but more likely the green electric fire.
You are right, though. I DO need to stop posting.
Not an increase in evil acts, but an increase in how evil those acts can be.
That’s such utter bullshit, you can’t possibly be taking yourself seriously.
Astronomers are climbing over each other to make (and receive the attribution for) new discoveries; it’s an incredibly competitive field - there’s no better way to make a name for yourself than turn our complete understanding of the universe upside down. The reason your electric universe thing hasn’t done that is that it is mostly baseless woo-woo speculation and ignorant wibble.
No, it’s because of people like you. Also, because Electric Universe opponents have been saying that it’s ignorant wibble for so long that if the truth finally came out they’d be out of jobs for being so ignorant themselves.
But mainly it’s because evil people can’t be allowed to know the truth of all things.
What year was this “Electric Universe” hypothesis put forth?
Who decides what is “truth” and why are evil people (and who gets to decide who is evil?) prohibited from knowing the truth?
But again, that you are actually debating this, trying to persuade people, is evil in and of itself. You’re acting immorally, by your own standards, right now. And if that’s so, then *you * must be included in these evil people that you mention.
TheFonz, I’m pasting a question I asked in the other thread. Again no offense, I’m just curious.
Perhaps you’re right, but our model of the universe works - it explains observable phenomena and generates reliable predictions. Yours merely steams, from where it was recently pulled, fully-formed, out of your ass.