When he falls down the stairs, he strikes his head on a staircase railing, hard enough to crack the wood. His Mom witnesses the fall. He’s out cold for a minute or two, and delirious for a minute after that. Then the pain in his neck starts up (which started BEFORE the fall, and is completely non-physical, but of course that’s irrelevant from the EMT’s point of view.) At this point he’s fully conscious & able to move, but can’t move very much because the pain is so bad. The mom gets frightened and dials 911.
Also…and this makes things more complicated, of course…the kid’s a pathological liar. The mom tells this to the EMT’s flat out. And yes, the kid does stupid shit like saying he sees four fingers instead of two, etc.
I know what “raccooning” is, but what is “battles sign”? “Pupils PERL” – would they say “PERL” as a word, or use the initials? That would tie in great with a theme that’s already established, both as the oyster-made jewel and the computer language.
Oh, would it be likely for him to have a nosebleed? I can’t imagine striking my head that hard and NOT having at least a small bleed, maybe just a trickle.
And when the kid pukes, it’s from the doctor doing an abdominal exam, so unfortunately I can’t work it so he gets the full spray.
(And yeah, the kid lied about not being nauseous, too…)
Phew! Ok, forget seizure, he’s being combative. That’s already established. Would that be acceptable? The way I’ve written it, the orderlies stand on each side BUT DO NOT TOUCH HIM while she asks him questions about the TV, the vase, the curtain, and when he can’t explain everything (he’s lucid, and trying to play it off as a nightmare) she gives the order to strap him down.
I’m guessing, since combativeness can be a sign of brain injury, she uses that and excuse to strap him down. Basically, that’s her game – finding excuses to hurt patients that are “logical” by all outside witnesses. Would that work?