Engineering licenses, again: One very specific question:

Some of you will recall the LONG thread concerning engineering licences, correct use of the title ‘Engineer’, and so forth, with even Anthracite agreeing that anyone who’d gone through all the hoops to get a BS in engineering science, and was employed somewhere in an engineering capacity, could justly style themselves ‘Engineer’.

Well, I just happened to look up the California law concerning this, and it turns out that its illegal in just about any circumstance to call yourself any type of engineer unless you’ve got the license. It seems that even if you describe yourself as an engineer in casual conversation, because you’ve got the bachelor’s degree, you’re a lawbreaker. So my question is this: Let’s say you graduate with a BSEE and go to work at Verizon, what CAN you call yourself? What do you put on your business card until several years down the road when you do get your license?

I would think you are what your job title is. If you job title is Engineer you are an Engineer. You my not be a professional engineer but you would on you buisness card you would put something like:

javaman
Verizon
Engineer

(555) 121-2121

If the state has a beef with that they can take it up with the company you work at. I could be wrong though

In most states it is OK if your job title is engineer even if you are not a PE. It is not OK to market your services to other companies as an engineer (as a consultant) if you are not a PE. Most PE’s are in civil engineering and construction. IBM , AT&T and companies like that do not need you to be a PE when they hire you to design computers and other products.

I’m only a bit familiar with CA and it’s situation. IIRC, like many laws of this sort, CA put it into place but does not actively prosecute. And thus many people ignore it.

To answer your question - what is it that one does at Verizon? Design cell tower structures? Set up networks? Code? Regardless of how I feel about the use of the title (and javaman, I think you have a good idea), if CA says you cannot use the title, then you need to find another. “Telecommunications Structural Designer”, “Network Systems Planner and Implementer”, and “Maximum Procounsel of Software Design” all sound a whole Hell of a lot more impressive than:

Engineer.

In NY the PE exam is in 2 parts, the 1st part you can take right out of college and you become a EIT or engineer in training, then after working for some years you can go for your PE.
I think both can use the term engineer, but not the P part

Please, help us out with a cite. Can you give us a section number or a URL? California’s legal codes can be searched online at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html .

I couldn’t find anything exactly like you describe, here is the closest I could get:
From Business and Professions Code SECTION 6700-6706.3:

From SECTION 6730-6749

From SECTION 6750-6766

I see nothing that prevents use of just the word “Engineer”, or combinations not specifically excluded such as “Software Engineer”, or “Circuit Design Engineer”, or “Hair Style Engineer”, but I didn’t look excessively hard. Can you help out?

[sub]I’m not making a statement as to the good/bad nature of titles such as “Software Engineer” and “Hair Style Engineer”, just the legality.[/sub]

Oh, and by the way, the original thread: Engineering License? This turned into a great debate.

I am not a “degreed” Engineer,but I am an Engineer nonetheless.I currently hold a NJ state Refrigeration Engineers License which allows me to operate Ammonia Ref. plants.My job title is Operating ENGINEER…so that’s what I call myself when people ask.