[QUOTE=Usram]
IIRC TheLoadedDog works for the Australian postal service and says that relying on postal codes is actually a somewhat old-fashioned approach, modern sorting systems taking the entire address into account. That is, the more items of address information you provide, the more likely the package is to arrive on time. Minimal addresses such as street name, number, postcode will work but are not optimal.
Anyway since reading his/her posts on the subject I have made an effort to be fulsome in the addresses I use for snail mail. Like “The Hollies, 4 Hollybush Close, Leafy Park, Upper Twattingford, FROTTINGHAM, Trumptonshire, FR3 5QS”.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, that’s correct. I wouldn’t say postal codes will be obsolete tomorrow, but they are becoming increasingly less important. If some low-paid grunt at a government agency mistakenly addressed “The Hollies, 4 Hollybush Close, Leafy Park, Upper Twattingford, FROTTINGHAM, Trumptonshire, UNITED STATES FR3 5QS”, the machines would still possibly route it to the UK, after tallying the number of clues. Of course, this makes it a bitch if you live in Birmingham, Alabama or Canada Bay in Sydney, etc.
Some of the funniest UK ones are when some lower middle class type with pretentions has gone for the “complete lack of numbers” look in their address, when it’s clear that it’s not really a “The Mews, Shittington House, Fuckstick-on-the-water” type of residence, but clearly a suburban house in Liverpool. This happens quite a bit.
I claim the shortest address:
My real name
SWLF
AUSTRALIA
…would get to me at work (and you could make it even shorter by one word if posting from Australia).