I have a close relative who used to suffer from seizures. Over a period of a couple of years, he had a total of two or three grand mal seizures. At the time, his driving privileges were revoked for about a year. But he’s had the condition under control for a long time with medications. It’s been over fiften years since his last seizure. His driving privileges were restored long ago, and he was able to return to full-time employment, retiring eventually from his college teaching job.
He also has a personality that likes play the victim, and claim to suffer injustices which, on closer inspection, turn out not to be true.
For this reason, I am skeptical of something he claimed in a recent conversation.
He owns several guns, and used to enjoy target shooting. Well, he insists that his history of epileptic seizures makes it illegal for him to purchase (or even use) a firearm.
I understand it could be a situation where the initial encounter with buying a gun or going to a shooting range would involve questions about being treated for mental health problems, or being on medication for epilepsy.
But I would also assume that documentation from his doctors testifying that he’s been seizure-free for so long would be taken into account.
For most people, obtaining this documentation would be a natural response to such questions. But as I said, my relative’s neurotic love of victimhood might prevent him from following up. It might be more satisfying to say, “They said no, because of my seizures twenty years ago - boy, life sure is unfair to me!”
He’s never been in any trouble with the law, even a misdemeanor. He has no history of substance abuse - he’s a lifelong teetotaler.
I presume laws would be highly variable from state to state. He lives in West Virginia.
Thoughts and experiences appreciated.