Erich von Däniken has died

This reminds of Sagan’s other excellent book, The Demon Haunted World. It explains why people fall for crap like this, they either don’t understand the scientific method yet or are just plain scared or don’t care to understand science.

Was he really a Von, or did he make that bit up as well?

for literature.

Fiction section?

Yes, he was, but he was a Swiss Von. Does that even count?

I remember eating his stuff up in the mid to late 70s when I was around 10 or so. It all made so much sense and seemed obvious. It was the same time as I watched In Search Of and just about any “documentary” on Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster and the like.

HA! You fellow Wisconsinite! I STILL make fun of that!

Man eh TOE Wok. Ash wa BEEN non. Wah KEY shaw

No sir, we are NOT relations!

OTOH my otherwise seemingly great 7th and 8th grade teacher gave a presentation on Immanuel Velikovsky’s bizarre history theories. I think the presentation was given in seriousness, not as a learning exercise on critical thinking. If there was follow up, I missed it or don’t remember.

Same with me. 10 is the perfect age for it. Some people never grow out of it. In Search of was my favorite show.

Ezekiel saw a wheel. This is the wheel he said he saw.

And Shah WAH no. :wink:

“My rank is the highest known in Switzerland: I’m a free citizen.”
—G.B. Shaw, Arms and the Man

I learned of it when I was 13 and browsing the paperbacks at the corner store. An anti-Däniken book titled Crash Go the Chariots. It refuted claims made in Chariots of the Gods? so that I never had any respect for EvD. It was by a Christian fundamentalist author, who based his arguments on the Bible, but nonetheless it destroyed EvD for me permanently before I even read CotG?. I bought it, hate-read it and sneered at it the whole time.

When I was 17, I took a Judaism class for Catholic kids taught by a rabbi. When he was talking about events in the Torah, one of the kids suggested CotG? as insight into Jewish history. The class took up the idea and decided to have a field trip to the rabbi’s office in the synagogue to watch the movie. It was a videotape cassette viewed on a TV set, as was done back in the 1970s. We didn’t take it seriously in the least, so we smoked a lot of pot on the way there and got so stoned the whole thing became a joke. But the rabbi was a good sport about it. One chill dude.

The first I learned of Velikovsky was reading Isaac Asimov’s takedown of Worlds in Collision when I was 14. So I never had any respect for Velikovsky either. Asimov mocked him for confusing hydrocarbons with carbohydrates, LOL.

I seem to recall a TV show that did a systematic take down of CotG. Maybe it was an episode of Nova?

… And all the ones on the Alamo began with “Tell ya whut….” :grin:

I believe so. I think it was one of the first episodes l ever watched, way back in the early ‘80s, right around the time Urey explained the iridium layer.

Back in the ‘60s and early ‘70s, I regularly attended planetarium shows at the Minneapolis Public Library. On one occasion, I picked up a pamphlet written by Kriswell, the whacko who introduced Plan Nine from Outer Space. At first, I thought it was a serious scientific work, but it rapidly became a treatise on Velikovsky’s universe. What it was doing at the Planetarium, I don’t know, but I still laugh when I think about it.