Escape from Tomorrow

In my never ending quest to see every horror movie known to humanity, I saw this for sale yesterday. After looking it up, the mechanics behind it sound interesting… a guerrilla film crew shot surreptitiously at Disney, using only their phones for scripts, moving about in small groups to go more undetected and only utility black and white video so they wouldn’t have to mess with setting up long and complicated lighting.

As for the plot? Due to its location, the protagonist father making a break with reality could prove intriguing. The reviews on IMDb seem to be split. Half say it’s the second coming, the rest think it’s nothing more than dreck. Of course, you have a few lone wolves who think the Mouse House was in cahoots with the director and is secretly backing it or that, oh my gosh, how stupid to not use color / sue / promote pedophilia. Don’t ask on that last one.

So, any Dopers watched it? If so, what did you think? If not, would you like to? I’ve tentatively put it on my “must see” list, but I really don’t want to waste my time if it’s a bunch of pretentious wankery or too much steady cam. It doesn’t always make me sick, but whatever it is, it truly has to be amazing.

Thanks in advance!

Whoops! Too late to add the link, so it here is:

I saw it via the Netflix DVD-by-mail service and it wasn’t very good. Kind of weird actually.

The idea (of a surreptitiously-made film) was interesting.

I started it. Nothing. 4X speed. Wait. Still nothing. Skipped ahead 30 minutes or so. Still nothing. Starting to wonder if “Edge Of Tomorrow” wasn’t a better film. Skipped ahead another 30 minutes. Still nothing. Decided that “Santa Claus Conquers The Martians” is a better film. Ejected & filed in the Circular File.

Thank you both. I think I’ll skip this one then unless it comes on free on cable.

Edge of Tomorrow is definitely better.

Here’s my thoughts from when I saw **Edge of Tomorrow ** at the Music Box Theatre in Chicago back in Nov 2013 (reviewed for a Disney fan podcast my husband and I host):

The film follows Jim White and his family at Walt Disney World. The day starts for Jim out on his balcony at the Contemporary Resort with a call from his boss in which Jim is fired. He decides to keep the news from his family to allow them to enjoy one more day of vacation.
And what follows is probably the most unusual day anyone has ever experienced at a Disney park. There is a pair of French girls who keep crossing paths with Jim, a man in a wheelchair and his family who keeps showing up, audio- animatronics whose faces turn demonic in front of Jim, an evil underground lair below Spaceship Earth, a strange new form of flu that turns you into a cat, and **lots **of drinking.
But wait, you also get a former Disney princess (with her bizarre stores of emu legs and Disney princesses in their off time) who seduces Jim and then later kidnaps his daughter. Then there’s the Disney cleanup crew that can implant memories directly into a person’s brain, an exploding Spaceship Earth, and more action around the Odyssey bathrooms in Epcot than we’ve ever seen!

Since I knew going in that it was a a guerrilla, experimental type film, I was expecting a non-traditional story, and that’s certainly what we got. I was fascinated by the central idea of someone having a nervous breakdown at a Disney Parks and how they would portray that.
I got some of what I was looking for - the scene in “its’ a small world” was VERY effective! I think the actor playing Jim did a decent job, and his son was truly creepy at times! However, it seems as if the filmmakers had lots of ideas that they wanted to include (flirty French girls, a “cat flu” epidemic, an evil genius with an underground lair) but didn’t think them all the way through in terms of how they would work together for a satisfying ending.

There’s also a bit of a Chekhov’s Gun situation with a hotel balcony that IMHO led viewers to expect one finale to the film, and they went a different (and rather disgusting!) way instead, to the detriment of the overall story. It’s also very much an adult film, in terms of language and brief nudity; but also has crude humor & slapstick.

I did enjoy seeing scenes set in the park - in particular, noting what locations were Walt Disney World (where the film was set) versus Disneyland - the Magic Kingdom scenes were probably almost 50-50 West vs East Coast, but some scenes were also shot in Epcot. In addition to filming on location, there were several “green screen” setups, where the actors performed in front of a background previously filmed in the park.

I’d really only recommend it to those looking for something WAY out of the ordinary. I’m glad I saw it, but am in no hurry to see it again. I’d say it’s worth getting thru Netflix if you’re already on the DVD plan, or streaming for a couple bucks, but not more than that.

I saw it, I thought it was fun. It’s a novelty film, it’s not destined to be a classic but it answers the question, “What could you do if you wanted to make a guerrilla film in Disneyworld” in about the best way possible. I thought the pacing and build-up were very well done, I remember laughing a few times. It helped that I saw it with friends in my living room, probably.

It’s a short movie, if you like quirky things you should see it. If you’re looking for a more conventional horror film, keep looking.

Well, I think I’ve changed my mind again. I don’t really watch horror movies to be scared anymore (that ship sailed a looooooooong time ago), but I love innovation. So, I think I’ll stream this. Thanks so much for the more in-depth critiques. That’s exactly what I was looking for and I feel it helps me understand the film better. Sounds right up my alley after all.

How much trouble can one get in to for shooting a film this way? I always wondered if one could make a film without having to go through the various film boards.

This movie seems to be on Amazon Prime, I think I’ll check it out.