I recently read a good book on complimentary and alternative medicine(CAM). The point of the book is to try and show whether or not CAM is distinguishable form placebo. Some of the things in the book got me thinking about the place of placebos in medicine. I don’t want this to be a debate about CAM treatments, or placebos in clinical trials. Rather I want to debate whether doctors should prescribe placebos to treat patients when there is no good pharmaceutical options. In the past U.S. pharmacies stocked a wide range of placebo pills, syrups, and solutions with different code names that doctors could prescribe. That has fallen out of practice in the U.S., but still happens in other places.
Here are some of the things we currently know about placebos:
From the book:
[ol]
[li]placebos have a statistically significant effect on short term pain[/li][li]a placebo causes activity in reward centers of the brain[/li][li]opioid blockers prevent the effect from occurring[/li][li]the placebo effect is correlated with the patients belief that they are getting real medicine[/li][/ol]
From a more recent source: The more expensive the patient believes the placebo to be, the more effective it is.
So placebos have real, observable effects that can be documented and explained, but they require deception to function. If patients knew what they were getting was inert, the effect would not occur and the higher the price they pay for it the better it works.
Up for debate, should doctors prescribe placebos? Is it ethical to do so? In today’s world with malpractice lawsuits, media everywhere, and consumer testing organizations is it practical?
Jonathan