This is from a survey by Middle Tennessee State University. Maybe I’m wrong in guessing the results would be similar if the survey were nationwide, but I think they would be.
This really depresses me. Can anyone provide information that Tennesee is somehow unusual in the number of its citizens showing ignorance of the candidate’s positions?
I guess I don’t actually have the seeds of a debate here, but I put it in GD because political threads usually belong here.
And evidence that voters in Ohio don’t want to be informeed by “outsiders.” Not sure how many are aware of The Guardian’s efforts to influence American politics by having Brits send letters to voters in Ohio. Click on the link for some American responses to these efforts. To be honest – there’s something very American about the responses provided at the linked site.
Wow. You really should read these. BTW, what specifically is “very American” about these? No argument from me, just curious about what makes these responses “American”. Here is one that caught my eye:
In 1980, more than half of all voters voted for Ronald Reagan, who ran on a platform of greatly lower taxes, greatly higher defense spending and balancing what was then considered a large federal deficit.
Were voters simply ignorant of his platform, or did they know his platform and believed it to be possible? Which was worse?
There isn’t necessarily the huge disconnect implied by the article. If one is a single issue voter (security/national defense), or merely favors a candidate based on some sort of social connection (he’s one of us).
My husband teaches at our local branch campus. He’s noted a very similar phenomenon to that in the OP. His students have loud, strident opinions, but can’t answer very simple questions about their candidate or the issues.
When asked, more than half of them admitted that they neither watch the news, read a newspaper, or do any research on the internet about current events. Their information is largely third or fourth hand: “What my mom said,” or “What my friend told me her preacher said.”
I dunno - sounds like a typical, knee-jerk American-raised-on-talk-radio reaction to me - don’t actually SAY anything, claim your superiority due just to being American, and throw insults and stereoypes at them.
Spoken just like someone from the upper left hand corner. You know, if we hadn’t bailed you guys out back in the 60s, you’d all be speaking Vietnamese!
Good point. I am sufficiently familiar with the Republican Party line at the national level that if the only options on the ballot were whoever the Republicans ran and Satan, Satan would get my vote because he would be preferable. My political leanings are decidedly anarcho-syndicalist, and is is almost inconceivable that of whoever could manage to get the nomination as the Democrat and Republican candidate for President, the Democrat candidate would be preferable. And if either party did nominate a candidate who ran a campaign with extremely atypical politics for the party, surely that would be all over the news.
Paying close attention to the issues only makes sense if your politics tends to be in the middle of the political spectrum. Those whose politics aren’t probably need not bother.