EVs: the likely field emerges.

V2G would be designed to decrease the amount of spinning reserves needed for short term spikes in demand.

These spikes are often extremely brief, and subsequent to them the baseline supply scheduled for the time of day is ample. The concept for V2G is that vehicles’ batteries can provide a buffer for supplying those brief spikes while still having plenty of time to be fully recharged when unplugged to go. Different systems are envisioned, many of which would allow a car owner to schedule when they want their car fully charged by and which allow the car owner to be compensated at a premium for supplying what is to the utility otherwise very expensive marginal electricity to supply.

Wikipedia gives a brief sketch of the concept.

More about V2G.

Also please note: The batteries can do this without significant degradation.

But as that last cite notes, the car owners need a decent enough slice of that $4000/yr the utility would be saving to make it worth their while. $100/yr won’t cut it.

And the reduced mileage you’ll get from hauling that extra 60# around all the time.

Here’s the thing- in a gas/electric hybrid, like the Volt- if you run out of power, you can simply go to a gas station, and in 5 minutes you’re on your way. True, in urban America you may rarely want to go more than 100 miles (and you could rent a car for long trips)- but if you did “run out” it means EIGHT FUCKING HOURS getting a recharge. And that 100 miles or whatever is an estimate. Let’s say you were in a hilly town, and had 60 miles of driving that day- and the battery ran out after 50? EIGHT FUCKING HOURS getting a recharge or a tow then those 8 hours.

And, there is no need at all for a pure electric vehicle. If you do just short urban trips, you can buy today a Neighborhood EV, one with a 50-100 mile range and a top speed of around 40MPG. True you can;t drive it on the freeway. But it’s a fraction of the price, takes up less room, and often is less to insure and pay taxes on.
S

In order to make pure EV’s a reality, we have to assume a customer who:
Will never want to drive more than half the posted maximum range-
Needs to drive on the Freeway for part of that.
and has a charging station available.

Are you talking about gas stations, which will top up your puny gas engine that can barely come up with half the power your electric motor needs to keep you running at speed, or an alternative powerplant, which provides half of power you ask for when you turn left and hope to beat the oncoming traffic?

I wonder if all these EVs could help us out of the recession. I hope the Volt is so successful it makes the K-Car look like a bad idea in comparison.

I think plug-in hybrids are a better solution. From an engineering standpoint, if 80% of your trips are within 20km, why would you want to haul around hundreds of extra pounds of useless batteries? The Volt feels like a more optimal solution - for 80% of your driving, you drive on electric alone. But when you need to go a long way, or get busy and can’t make it to a charging station, you can just fire up the gas engine and drive for hundreds of miles. But for the 80% case, you’re driving on electric and you’re carrying around much less weight.

I also like the fact that the Volt could potentially be used as a gas generator. Nice to know that if there’s a blackout you can just fire up the car and have access to large amounts of instant power.

To the plug-in v. BEV comment: it depends on cost and weight, doesn’t it? Which depends both on the technology and on how much range people end up feeling they really need. Please note that your comment could also be turned on its head. Why would you want to lug around an ICE and all of its associated accoutrements, when you get away without those hundreds of extra pounds and cost?

No, at least in its announced form, the Volt has no ability to to deliver power back out. Maybe someday.

I don’t understand your question. :confused: