I got into this late but I have had this discussion many times elsewhere.
The basic requirements for a sport to be allowed into the Olympics are:
- It has to be a sport.
- It has to be played in many places on many continents.
- It must have an international federation that sets out the rules of play and requirements for participation.
Looking at the sports mentioned for inclusion in this thread:
** It has to be a sport. **
A sport is a physical contest with defined criteria for victory where victory is the intrinsic purpose of the contest.
Chess is not s sport; it’s a game. It’s a hell of a game but it’s not a physical contest.
Shooting IS a sport; it’s a physical contest. Believe me, it’s not easy to be a good shot.
As to whether or not judged events (e.g. ice dancing) are sports - I think they are, but I’m not sure I like it. Almost ALL judged sports at the Olympics are corrupt; ice dancing has become a complete joke wherein all results are predetermined, even if the predetermined winners make huge errors.
** It must be played in many countries on many continents.**
This is why sumo wrestling isn’t an Olympic sport yet; for the purposes of Olympic qualification it simply is not played in enough countries. There used to be guidelines for how many countries needed national associations for a sport to qualify (the guidelines are less strict for the Winter Games.) I don’t know if they use the guidelines anymore.
This, of course, is why American football isn’t an Olympic sport; it’s played only in the U.S., by Americans, with a 99% similar sport being played in Canada.
This is also why sychronized swimming is at risk of being taken out of the Games; it was talked about very seriously in 1996. It’s not catching on; not enough countries are trying to send teams. Solo synchronized swimming has already been taken out.
** It has to have an international federation.**
This, incidentally, is non-negotiable. Every Olympic sport, without exception, draws its rules at least in part from an internationally recognized organization. The IOC relies on these organizations to set rules and qualification guidelines.
The fourth criteria the Olympics doesn’t apply is ** it has to be objective.** I’d happily take out every sport with judging. Boxing, gone. Gymnastics, gone. Figure skating, gone. Take the judging out of ski jumping (yes, they judge the quality of landings and add it to your score) and let people do frigging faceplants if they want.
So what sports SHOULD be added to the Olympics? Everyone’s talking about what they’d take out. I wanna be different.
- Billards.
The first spport that should be admitted to the Olympics, beyond any doubt or question, is billiards. Snooker AND nine-ball.
Yeah, I know, it seems silly. But the absence of billiards from the Olympics is completely inconsistent with the requirements for represented sports. Billiards IS a sport. It is played throughout the world. An international federation determines accepted rules. It’s played by both men and women at a competitive level. There is no conceivable reason billiards isn’t in but ping pong is, aside from it always being that way. (And don’t tell me it’s called table tennis. It’s ping-pong, dammit.)
- Golf.
I’m not sure why golf isn’t in the Olympics. Or maybe it is. If it is you never hear about it, like tennis. If it isn’t, it should be, for every reason tennis is.
- Croquet.
Stop laughing; some people are REALLY into croquet. There’s an international federation, it’s played throughout the world, and it’s actually hard as hell to play it well.