executive producer

im watching the opening credits to the osmond brothers movie
they list 8 executive producers, and one “co”-executive producer-

two of the executive producers have their names on the screen together while all the rest are listed alone
what the hell do they all do?
what is a “co” executive producer? why are some listed together and some alone?

and why is that when a movie is reviewed , the producers never get the heat when the movie is bad-they are the ones who are putting it out there and supposedly watching the progress and controlling what is being made (if its not going well, they should be getting on the director)
yet these egomaniacs are never even mentioned in reviews-its always the actors or the director who are at fault or who get all the credit-why?

and why am i watching a movie about the osmonds?

I assume this has something to do with how much money was put into the project and whose agent was more influential.

Because reviews of films focus on the creative aspects, the acting, directing, and writing. No critic reviews a film and says “The producer obviously didn’t pay the caterer enough.” However, if your film wins Best Picture, it’s the producer who gets to keep that award.

Consult your local physician.

You’ve touched on one of the great mysteries of Hollywood, to wit, What does a producer do? Or, more specifically, what’s the difference between a producer, an executive producer, an associate producer, a line producer, etc., etc., etc.

An executive producer can fulfill any number of functions, but generally they oversee the financial end, and approve front-end creative decisions (casting, artistic crew hiring, and so on). They may be someone like Arnon Milchan, who runs his own independent production company, or Harvey Weinstein, who as co-head of Miramax exercises his right to stick himself in as executive producer of everything they do. Generally, they don’t get involved in the day-to-day work on the film, but they are the ultimate authority (with the minor exception of directors who have wangled final cut and other small creative concessions). It’s also the executive producer who provides the voucher to the bank or other financial authority when negotiating completion bonds and other monetary arrangements.

The producer, on the other hand, is usually directly involved with the work on the film. For example, Julia Phillips, in her trashy tell-all You’ll Never Eat Lunch in This Town Again, talks about being on-set in India for Spielberg’s Close Encounters. When Steve decided he wanted a fancy overhead shot, it fell to Julia to run around looking for a cherrypicker. Also, she had to arrange security for Richard Dreyfuss, who had received death threats.

Sometimes the producer is more intimately involved with the creative decision-making on the film, and, as you rightly point out, should get more credit or blame for the ultimate result. One producer who does get mentioned in reviews is Jerry Bruckheimer, who has given us Con Air, Armageddon, and Coyote Ugly, among others; he’s also the exec on the new police series “C.S.I.” His movies all look exactly the same, regardless of who’s directing, and it’s due to his influence.

So, to summarize, some producers hang back and let the director run the show, taking care of the day-to-day details (as with Phillips above) the director doesn’t have time to worry about; some, like Bruckheimer, have a major hand in the look and feel of the movie.

By the way, “associate producer” is kind of a joke. This is mentioned in the new David Mamet film State and Main, which I highly recommend. The writer of the movie-in-the-movie is unhappy about something, so the producer offers to buy him off with an associate producer credit, even though he isn’t really doing anything. Another common instance: One guy buys the rights to a book. Hollywood decides to make it, and comes to the guy with checkbook in hand. The guy may know nothing about movies; he happened to be in the right place with the cash when the book came available. His deal to Hollywood: Pay me, and call me an associate producer, even though all I am, really, is a middleman.

Lately the industry has been cracking down on the proliferation of the producer credit. The motion picture academy, for example, won’t give a Best Picture Oscar to more than three recipients, which may account for all the extra “executives” you saw, as several people got artifically promoted to keep their names in the credits.

Hollywood’s a weird place, kids…

thanks cervaise
i guess my question should have been don’t these “producers” know how stupid they look when they have to have their names on the credits of bad movies?
personally, i dont care who put the money up for a film-
i am amazed that these people who really have nothing to do with the making of the film want their names all over it-

Cervaise has provided a comprehensive answer, although I take mild exception to the comment about Mr. Bruckheimer. No matter.

Very generally…

Executive Producer: a deal-maker. Arranges the money for the project, and ultimately carries the can in terms of whether the people putting up the money (usually the studio) feel they got a good deal. Or not. Can also be involved in pulling together the right ‘mix’ of elements (property, director, producer, star) so that the deal gets made.

**Producer{/b]: takes care of logistics. Makes sure the money, the people and the equipment are all where they should be, when they should be, for the film to happen, and balances the schedule against the budget. Settles rows and bangs heads together.

Director: decides what the camera sees and how the results are edited.

Writer: gets treated like scum. Finds it hard to get paid, recognised or thanked.

The terms ‘co-’ and ‘associate’ may mean one of the above jobs was shared, or that one person ‘helped’ another. But just as often it represents some political deal-fixing and ego massage. Example: studio has producer, wants star. Star won’t sign unless his pal is producer. Studio hates pal. Pal is made ‘Associate producer’, gets big fee but does nothing. Star is mollified, film gets made.

Sorry about the bold rash. Should have previewed.

Very generally…

Executive Producer: a deal-maker. Arranges the money for the project, and ultimately carries the can in terms of whether the people putting up the money (usually the studio) feel they got a good deal. Or not. Can also be involved in pulling together the right ‘mix’ of elements (property, director, producer, star) so that the deal gets made.

Producer: takes care of logistics. Makes sure the money, the people and the equipment are all where they should be, when they should be, for the film to happen, and balances the schedule against the budget. Settles rows and bangs heads together.

Director: decides what the camera sees and how the results are edited.

Writer: gets treated like scum. Finds it hard to get paid, recognised or thanked.

The terms ‘co-’ and ‘associate’ may mean one of the above jobs was shared, or that one person ‘helped’ another. But just as often it represents some political deal-fixing and ego massage. Example: studio has producer, wants star. Star won’t sign unless his pal is producer. Studio hates pal. Pal is made ‘Associate producer’, gets big fee but does nothing. Star is mollified, film gets made.

Note that this is only the definition of EP for movies. In the television world (where I grew up), the money comes from the production company (which gets it from orders of X amount of episodes from a network), and the EP has virtually complete creative control. In the few shows I wrote for, the EP was involved in the casting, the writing, the on-set “supervision” of the “director”, etc. She defined the characters and the storyline arc over the episodes, and was the person in charge of the entire production, only reporting to the production company chief (and the occasional network complaint).

Sorry about bumping a thread from a couple of months ago, but I’m following up on my answer from above.

If anyone’s interested, I just posted a very long essay (7000 words) on my website describing in excruciating detail, with examples and citations, exactly what movie producers do, and the difference between producers, executive producers, associate producers, etc.

If you want to check it out, follow the link in my sig. Thanks!