Okay, so, to be honest, sounds like incompetence plus wanting to pass the buck to me.
I will be honest, the procedure on T-Mobile’s side was a real, REAL pain prior to the app based unlock, and if the tiniest thing went wrong, yeah, it had a lot of delays. The reason is two fold 1) retention and 2) abuse.
Each in order. First, the POS. Generally, because of reasons 1 & 2 above, the TSR (tech service rep) couldn’t actually do it themselves. We would verify eligibility, reasons, and then fill out a form that was emailed up the chain. Which is why we gave an ETA of 72 BUSINESS hours to complete the request, at which you’d get a text and/or email with a link to complete the steps (for an iphone) or a confirmation it was done for iPhone. And if one, tiny little thing wasn’t filled in on said form properly, they didn’t contact us or the customer, it just went into the VOID until the customer called back.
So probably the AT&T process is similar in the time taken, but a competent tech would have set proper expectations (because callbacks are a metric that kill you). As for the Store reps… We were always told to bend over backwards not to make work for them, because frankly, their job was sales. That’s what they got paid on. They were also to answer general questions and handle in store payments, but any tech or dispute was our or customer service’s job. We all had different skillsets, but that was a bitch when they decided to ‘blend’ us all, so that they could take advantage of the perceived down time of techs to handle overflowing customer service calls, which left us zero time to follow up with customers. sigh
Okay, back to points 1 and 2. So yeah, it’s a retention thing, so in many cases, a supervisor would follow up with the customer especially if it was an exception to the rules (requesting an unlock while NOT paid off due to Military service and/or international travel as main examples). They’d also probe to make sure that this wasn’t going to lead to loss of the customer or (point 2) the phone going bye-bye. Which was a HUGE abuse. Not quite up there with people selling their (non-paid-off) phones on Ebay and us getting calls as to why their shiny new phone didn’t work, but way up there. It’s a known issue where those phones get unlocked and then ‘get lost/stolen’ and an insurance claim is made [in your case, since paid off, it should have been easier but…].
So, at this point, what can you do. Well, you’ve done it. Seriously, this is a case where the squeaky wheel gets the grease, especially when they’re already on the record as saying one thing and then having to backtrack. This is probably as escalated as it can be by now - with the proviso that the weekend (and pre-holiday short staffing) probably killed the timeframe I mentioned earlier (3 business days is probably about NOW depending on the research into the previously blocked #).
If you want to push (or don’t have an answer soon) I’d follow up every 48 hours, because that’s the sort of metric that gets management involved. But rather than spend all day on the phone, I’d probably recommend using an online chat with an agent. That way you can do something fun and/or productive (like the SDMB!) on your computer rather than staying near a phone that’s giving you steady xfinity/u-verse adds.
T-Mobile also had online service through DM/PM on Facebook and twitter (I was part of that team part time), and I believe AT&T does the same, if that’s part of your skillset and interests.
Again, there is absolutely some screw ups in their telling you incorrect information, but in my experience, it’s mostly business as usual for this PARTICULAR issue.