Then if you think thats enough to convict, why cant you except the thousands of case reports of people who claimed they’ve seen the astral world when they died?? See here: http://www.near-death.com/
I dont really care if it would stand up in a journal of science. I know what happened to me, and it was as real as me typing this post right now
You get that there is a difference between objective (what you described in your ‘gotcha’ question) evidence and subjective evidence (what you are now describing) - right?
You get that they are entirely different things and that your attempted gotcha fails all reason due to that, right?
One of these things is not like the other.
If a 1000 people - or even a million people - ‘claimed’ to have seen someone murder another person - but had every detail other than the claim itself different - no one would be convicted based on that evidence alone - further - on your original question - you had the folks being ‘eye witness’ to an event that was observable to all - and even then - without additional physical evidence (ie - the body and other physical evidence) - the testimoney of the eye witness would not, in and of itself, be enough to convict.
No, that’s wrong: weight at death does not diminish. You’re quoting absurdities.
15 grams? That’s well within our capability of measuring. That would have been evident in the 1850s. Today, a deficiency of tens of milligrams could be detected.
You’re not being in the least convincing to anyone here (and that’s most of us) who know at least the elements of high-school science.
For those that do wanna learn more about this subject, you can learn the art of going out-of-body (or astral projection) yourself. Its time consuming, and it’ll take months to learn it, but in the end I feel its worth it:
I didn’t infer that astral projection equals psychic ability and I wasn’t debating you. Don’t answer the question if you don’t want to; no skin off my apple.
No, I was not. I was talking about the James Randi Educational Foundation Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge to any person who demonstrates any psychic, supernatural, or paranormal ability.
We’ve done our research. We’re also waiting for evidence. Without evidence, the subject is titanically uninteresting.
And, look, we’ve been through it all before here. Before your time, we’ve had guys here who met God. That’s right, they met God.
So you’re just bringing petty stuff to the table.
Of course, their evidence for having met God was…the same as your evidence for the human body losing 15 grams of mass at death: nil. (Except you’ve got a web site you can point to. But we can point to the Time Cube just as easily. What you haven’t got is…wait for it…evidence.)
Also, the James Randi foundation considers astral projection to be supernatural, so you would qualify for their prize if you could accomplish it. Just don’t tell them it’s “natural.” Their definitions, their money. The problem is, you can’t accomplish it by natural means, either, so your disclaimer of supernaturalism is moot.
Many claim that when going to the astral plane, one can talk to dead people. You claimed the astral plane is where dead people are. Can you communicate with them? You said you were going to start a detailed thread on this today. Where is it? Doing research regarding what others say isn’t going to help me understand what your claims are. You mentioned out of body experiences and dead people on another plane that can be visited. That would qualify as supernatural or paranormal.
That is not how it works. You wandered in here making odd claims that you are now refusing to defend on the grounds that the terms you used have a different meaning or context than their usages in normal conversation. If you want to toss that stuff out, it is up to you to provide the explanations–without being snide about it.