Bricker:
But you’re not the one who gets to decide what those rights are.
As it happens, we have a system to do that. You can CLAIM the Constitution protects the right to impersonate a member of the armed forces or wear military medals you didn’t earn, but Congress doesn’t agree with you, and neither did the federal court that has considered the issue.
So what’s your basis for asserting that this law violates the Constitution? Unless the Predsident has appointed you to a federal bench somewhere, I don’t see why we would take your interpretation as the right one, and the actual Congress of the United States and an actual federal district judge’s as the wrong ones.
So if I search on your username, I won’t find you ever, anywhere, arguing that a law passed by Congress or a decision by a federal court is in any way bad, or violates the Constitution?