The only post in the thread from him was [post=7324013]this one[/post]:
I don’t think his post qualifies as the weaponized rhetorical you argue against in the OP. Evil One came closer, but still not quite there, with [post=7286729]this[/post]:
The only really on-point (for this thread) argument from that thread was from hawksgirl, who provided a cite with which to present the idea, and then expressed satisfaction with its credibility [post=7294335]here[/post]:
But even still, it was not presented as a rhetorical. It was a definitive assertion, and it wasn’t even hers; it was a quote from her cite: “Most women will not lie about being raped for any reason.”
I agree with the idea of your OP, but I haven’t seen it used much in practice on the boards. Anytime someone tries, it seems a blizzard of counter-cites are provided showing that rape has the highest incidence of false reporting of all tracked crimes.
People get wound up over sex crimes in a way that just doesn’t happen for other crimes. For example, some states require that sex offenders be “registered” Not so for burglars, arsonists, and murderers.
Accusations of sexual misconduct are uniquely damaging and uniquely difficult to disprove. Many male doctors and dentists take steps to make sure they are never alone with a female patient for this reason.
I think instead of visiting the potential sentence upon a false accuser, a false accusation of a sex crime should be considered a sex crime in and of itself. Let the false accuser have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his or her life, informing neighbors upon moving in, the whole deal.
While that would certainly be emotionally satisfying, I’m not sure it’s the best policy. Because it would ensure that very few people would ever recant a false charge.