So me and my friend have a bet going on, and I need to be proven right!
So here it is:
Do fast food restaurants charge more if you get your food for ‘here’ rather than ‘to go’. I thought I heard that they charge more to eat in because they have to clean up after you.
In Germany, where I live not, I guess there are legal restrictions that would prohibit this. But I’ve frequently experienced this abroad, eg in a French McDonald’s (I don’t know about the situation in America, sorry). There are many reasons why the restaurant would prefer you take your food away: You’re not taking up a precious table, they don’t have to clean, etc.
Probably every restaurant has its own policy on this, since the outlets usually aren’t run by the big corporation itself but by independent sub-companies in a franchise scheme. And local legislation might play a role as well, but I’m sure you’re doing your fast food manager a favor if you take it away.
When I lived in California, one restaurant (Togos) didn’t charge tax (or charged less tax) if you got it to go. It was up to the restaurant whether to not charge the tax, and most didn’t bother with the different rates, so just going to a restaurant to settle the bet won’t work in your favor, unless you’ve verified the store’s policy ahead of time.
While I’m not doubting that you know what you’re talking about, I just don’t get what’s the point about a tax if the restaurant may choose not to charge it???
(I’ve read about all that sales tax chaos in the US regarding online stores, which seems to have resulted in the stores paying the tax more or less voluntarily, but in restaurants?)
I remember this from when I lived in California as well, McD’s would charge tax for dine in and not for take out. Never could understand it. Never noticed it in Massachusetts when I was there, nor here in Washington state.
But don’t give them any ideas, they’re already looking to take everything they can…
The “tax only for eat-in” applies in Ohio, as well. The rationale I heard is that (in Ohio) food isn’t normally taxable, but when you’re eating at a restaraunt, it’s a “luxury”, hence taxable. No, I’m not claiming this makes sense: I’m not sure where one could possibly eat a Big Mac to make it luxurious.
I live in NH and no they don’t charge extra for “eat-in” here. I often get it to go and then just sit at a table anyway though, the trays are not neccesary… thats what the burger wrapper is for!
From the state’s point of view, I think Chronos’s post is correct. From the point of view of the restaurant, it may be easier to just charge everyone the higher tax (and turn it all over to the state), which is why not all restaurants follow the two-tiered system.
OK,
I travel consistently and will give you the scoop. I just reviewed my reciepts and will tell you what I found. These excerpts are from my reciepts:
NY state - “eat in” tax when at the restaurant, basic sales tax when taking out.But when I got a few things at the supermarket by the office, no sales tax.
Texas - flat sales tax regardless
California - flat sales tax, except my friggin city has an alcohol consumption tax - must be serious drinkers here
Utah - 6.25% sales tax + 1.00% restaurant tax
So, as you can see, it really matters what each of the glorious fifty want to do.