But wait, these don’t even make much sense.
What’s their point with the first line?
The second point seems dubious to me, but I haven’t seen the studies, so I’ll bypass that.
Third point I think is skewed perception of the meaning of the word “portion” and how those numbers should be used. Also, I believe the “diet industry” isn’t the group of people who “decided” on the average daily recommended caloric intake. Furthermore, isn’t packing a layer of fat the very definition of “overeating”? If you’re eating more than you need to maintain health and condition, you’re over-eating. You won’t put on fat if you don’t take in extra calories, it doesn’t just magically appear.
Lastly, food addiction isn’t about food, per se and strictly speaking, so what’s the problem with assuming that different methods of treatment from the “AA model” might be necessary? Even alcoholics can’t always be helped with the AA model of addiction treatment. As our illustrious QtM outlined in another thread, the 12-step method of treatment works best for certain types of alcoholics–true addicts–but that for binge drinkers and other types of problem drinkers, other methods are more successful.
More anecdotal data: In general, I eat about a third of my husband’s food intake. We’ll order a large pizza for dinner for the occasional treat and I’ll stuff myself on three slices while he finishes three quarters of the pie. I honestly cannot fathom having the internal capacity to take in the sheer volume of food he puts down his gullet. He’s wearing the same jeans he wore in college, though is maybe a little squishier around the middle. He’s not one of those rail-thin, high metabolism guys, either.
If I want to be fit and healthy, and I do, I have to limit the bulk of my intake to healthy whole foods, and be very careful about portion sizes for calorically dense foods like, you know, pizza. I also have to exercise routinely. It’s true that on “normal foods” I stay fat on a very small intake. When I’m careful to limit my intake to healthy whole foods like grains and veggies, good meat and dairy, I find myself taking in a much larger volume of food and eating much more frequently. The result of this is that I lose weight eating “more” food because I’m taking in fewer calories overall–whether you gain or lose weight isn’t about the total volume of food intake, it’s about the choices you make. You don’t get fat eating brown rice and broccoli.
The point is, “normal” weight people might be eating similar amounts of food, but either their natural metabolism is quite different, or they’re making different food choices. Either way, if a fat person wanted to be fit, they’d need to make different choices somewhere along the line. I’m the last person in the world to be flippant about weight loss, it’s hard as hell to do and harder still to maintain, but these folks don’t want to lose weight, they want to complain about the world treating them badly because they’re overweight. I’m totally down with treating people with kindness and respect across the board, and down with defense of overweight folks in general, but I don’t think deluding themselves that they didn’t put the fat on their body in the first place is helping the cause.*
*Barring health complications and blah blah blah.
ETA: samm beat me to it and said it in four sentences!