BTW, since we’re talking about cameras and police shootings, we got a win today: that murderous sonofabitch Patrick Feaster got convicted of manslaughter
Here’s a discussion of comparable support for the civil rights movement (at the time) vs BLM now.
apples to oranges
The civil rights movement used FACTS to rally their supporters.
Black Lives Matter relies on lies…( FERGUSON )“hands up, don’t shoot”…( Minnesota )" handcuffed while shot "
BLM relies on facts like statistically disparate treatment of black people by law enforcement. They might utilize symbolic slogans, but they aren’t just based on a single incident… and the incidents you refer to weren’t proven conclusively to be false, just that there may not have been enough evidence for criminal proceedings.
In any case, about the same percentage oppose BLM now as opposed the civil rights movement in the 60s, and critics used similar reasons.
BLM has done a lot of good, like greatly increasing usage of body cameras, in addition to other police reforms in certain cities. Many police departments are working with BLM supporters to institute policy and procedural reforms.
…"shot while handcuffed "…WAS proven to be a lie as the forensic evidence made the claim by the racist HATE group ( Black Lives Matter) an impossibility !
Got a cite for that? Not that it really matters since it’s not based on a single incident.
Also, tell me about your feelings on the Jews. And/or “white genocide”. Maybe that will give me a better understanding of where you’re coming from.
So you compare BLM to Trump (with mixed results considering that Trump has never actually rioted or looted), doesn’t that tell you something about BLM?
These are not examples of riots or looting.
One of your links says that the violence broke out when neoNazis tried to crash their party and that a tea partier was injured by a union member counter-protester (both sides of that conflict claim the other guy started it.
The other link (you realize that you linked to a conservative talk radio show website, right?) shows that a news reporter was punched by a union counter-protester and an Americans for Prosperity tent was destroyed by counter-protesters.
Once again, these are not examples of riots or looting.
I was asaking how you came up with that very high number.
But if you are having trouble locating examples of BLM rioting and looting would you like some cites to some of the BLM riots and looting?
Yes, I am willing to concede that BLM might be as bad as Trump in its irrational hysteria with a kernal of truth that is getting drowned out by a lot of asshattery.
So just show me the videos of the Tea Party riots and looting. Threats of violence against politicians are wrong but its not the same as actual riots and looting. Just lacks that extra spice.
I don’t know about the handcuff incident but I took a long hard look at the Michael Brown evidence after the dust settled and it really looks like the officer was jstufied in shooting Michael Brown. There were other problems in the community and I know St. Louis well enough to know that it has a serious race problem but Michael Brown was just the wrong martyr for the cause. You know Rosa Parks was not the first black woman to refuse to get to the back of the bus, right? It was a pregnant teenager.
You don’t honestly think that statistically disparate treatment (which is probably more driven by unconscious bias than intentional racism) is the same thing as segregation and Jim Crow, do you? I was under the impression that the statistical science is still under review.
Sure, they are absolutely capable of doing a lot of good but their cause is undermined by violence and that violence is on their heads.
It’s not the same thing, and it’s not fully understood, but I think it’s more than just unconscious bias – sentencing disparities and using tickets and fees to raise revenue rather than serve and protect are two examples of policies that strongly and disparately negatively affect black Americans in many communities.
The violence hurts their cause, but I think it’s on the heads of those committing it, and not on the vast majority of BLM leaders and supporters who repudiate violence without exception.
I have never seen a video of Black Lives Matter protestors , while chanting death threats to cops, being told to “shut up” by other Black Lives Matter protestors
I put things like literacy tests and voter ID laws in a different category of malice than laws that unintentionally have disproportionate impact. I don’t think anyone is trying to impoverish blacks with tickets and fees even if that is the unintended result.
I think the leaders share some responsibility for not keeping shit under control. It doesn’t make them wrong but it does make them less right.
The Ferguson Effect would account for an increase in police safety. The thinking of many in law enforcement is that police are in increased fear for their safety and are therefore less likely to confront potential criminals. So police safety is enhanced.
What also happens is that civilian safety is lessened. as a result of the shift in police tactics. This is also something that happened lately. Can’t conclusively say that it’s a result of the Ferguson Effect, but it’s certainly consistent with it.
Not really.
There has been a short-term uptick in murder, but it almost entirely attributable to Chicago gang violence. Is your thesis that the Ferguson effect is happening solely in Chicago?
The truth is that if police disengaging makes police safer and crime rates continue to drop, then it’s a win-win.
Forgive me. “Almost entirely” is a bit hyperbolic. Chicago accounted for 234 of the 496 additional murders in 2015.
But violent crime and crime overall is about the same as pre-Ferguson levels, which is a 30-year low. Drawing conclusions from the murder rate, especially over the short-term, is usually misleading because there are relatively few murders and the rate can be greatly affected by trends and events that are not national in scale.
Your claim appears to be incorrect, and at best it’s highly misleading.
No, you’re the one being misled. You should read some actual analysis of the crime numbers.
The same applies to this claim.
No, you’re the one being misled. You should read some actual analysis of the crime numbers.
The crime rate in the 30 largest cities for 2016 is nearly unchanged from 2015. It has increased in some places and decreased in others.
Did you read your own cite?
According to that cite, overall violent crime is projected to go up 5.5% in 2016 over 2015 (this is on top of the above-noted cites which were about 2015 over 2014) and murders up 13.1%.