Horseshit.
Great. I’ll start a new thread when I have time and try to assemble the best data. No promises on timing, but soon.
Best not dawdle - it takes time to fake the videotape, bribe or coerce the clerk, fake a facial injury, and move all the bullet holes to the front of her body, especially for a small town police force.
Regards,
Shodan
Practice makes perfect.
Won’t “She was acting erratically and I saw a glint of a metal object when she turned around/reached for her waistband” work just as well? Or perhaps while she’s resisting, she reached for the officer’s gun. (Note: in case that last reference is unclear, the officer in the linked story is repeatedly saying “Stop Resisting! Get off my gun!” while the person behind apprended is totally not resisting or going for his gun.)
Does this have anything to do with the bogus comparison I was rebutting, or are you just changing the subject to avoid admitting error?
Its a damn shame what is going on right now in Ferguson.
The police have TOO MUCH power and think they are the military.
The US is quickly becoming a police state. wtf.
I strongly disagree, but as it’s a tangent on a tangent, I don’t have the energy to actually discuss it.
That’s why you need both the faked video, and punch yourself in the face.
Take some pride in your work, for heaven’s sake.
Regards,
Shodan
They’re awfully quick studies - twice in fourteen yearsand they’re expert.
Regards,
Shodan
Article discusses two shootings of unarmed black men. Reader concludes only 2 shootings of unarmed black men.
Boy, that cite totally clobbers any suggestion that local law enforcement was too quick to violent actions! Especially this part:
We liberal/lefty types are gluttons for punishment, as you may already know. So, you got any more like this?
Oh come on - it is obvious even from the most superficial reading of the article that it was cold-blooded murder by the police, motivated entirely by racism. Anyone can see that.
Here only fourteen years later - exactly the same thing. Wake up, sheeple!
Regards,
Shodan
Oh, the kicker:
Heck of a job, Brownie.
And this just in…
That “alleged” recording of the gunshots is authenticated. By way of our good friends and* Crooks and Liars…
*
I’m unable to view video at work; what is the implication of this recording?
From recollection, on the recording there is a pause after the first couple of shots, followed by a barrage of shots. This would not be consistent with the officer firing six shots to disable Brown.
Missed the edit window: CNN quotes a forensic audio expert saying he hears six shots, followed by four shots.
Did Glide authenticate anything other than the time the video was being made?
*In an e-mail to the Erik Wemple Blog, Glide head of communications Chaim Haas reports:
Because Glide is the only messaging application using streaming video technology, each message is simultaneously recorded and transmitted, so the exact time can be verified to the second. In this case, the video in question was created at 12:02:14 PM CDT on Saturday, August 9th*.
Why, no, actually. All it confirms is that there was a series of gunshots in rapid succession at a particular time. In America, that could be anywhere at 12:02:14 PM CDT.