There’s a thread over here where folks can suggest questions for use in future games. Please feel free to add some there.
But I am curious - which questions do you feel require specialized knowledge?
There’s a thread over here where folks can suggest questions for use in future games. Please feel free to add some there.
But I am curious - which questions do you feel require specialized knowledge?
And it could argued that the Shakespeare question is specialized knowledge too, but Shakespeare’s plays are almost as well known as The Simpsons.
Are we allowed to read the thread before we post?
Have fun and good luck
[/QUOTE]
er, just how general do you want the questions to be? “name a color”? “name a number”? but those would require knowing how to count or not being color blind so it could be argued that those require specialized knowledge as well
Well, now I want those questions, I might have half a chance then!
Edit to add: Please don’t look at my first answer, bleh. DOH! :smack:
My intention in creating the other thread was to have a repository of general-knowledge questions. Not specialized-knowledge ones, but one that a reasonably knowledgeable, intelligent person should have no trouble supplying an answer to.
This is why, for example, I listed “Name one of Shakespeare’s plays” as a question. You don’t have to have studied Shakespeare to know of his plays; they are still performed today, have been parodied in any number of comedy programs, supply the language with proverbs and idioms, and it would be reasonable to assume that everybody has heard of at least one. But I didn’t ask, “Name a character in ‘Midsummer Night’s Dream,’” since that would require a more specialized knowledge: at least a reading of the play and/or a viewing of one of the film versions.
In my own questions for the other thread, I was guided by one principle: a reasonably intelligent person should be able to think of a reasonable answer immediately, as on the actual Family Feud game show. I have to admit, the recent game’s question on Doctor Who sent me off to Wikipedia; I’ve never seen the show and I don’t care to see the show, but when I can think of nine out of ten answers immediately, and all that is stumping me is this damn Doctor Who question, well, I’ll refer to Wikipedia, pick a name at random, and post it. But IMHO, nobody should have to do that in a general game. Perhaps in a specialized game, as I alluded to in the other thread, but not in a general one.
I should point out that not all the questions that were posted in the other thread would meet my standard–naming the Hindu trinity, for example, would seem to me to be extremely specialized knowledge–but most were perfectly fine.
Justin does have a point–that everything requires some knowledge–but I disagree that it requires specialized knowledge. A mollusk, for example, might be well-known to folks living in fishing ports, but anybody who has eaten in a seafood restaurant, studied biology, or seen a “Family Guy” episode should be able to supply an answer that is in the ballpark. Same for a boy band; with all the celebrity shows, supermarket tabloid exposure, and news scandals involving pop stars, you don’t have to be familiar with Top 40 songs to supply a name. (And wasn’t N’Sync on an episode of the Simpsons once?)
What I am finding interesting, this Sunday afternoon, is how quickly this thread is filling in. Folks must be looking at the questions, saying “Hell, I can do these,” and doing them. Nobody (that we know of anyway) is giving up because they don’t know specifics; they are playing because they know generalities. And that’s what I was hoping these questions would do.
Enough of the hijack. Back to the game!