If someone thinks smoking is a problem in Vegas, they’ve never been to Atlantic City.
You can smell like smoke there just from walking outside.
Personally, I’d love more smoke-free rooms at casinos, but I don’t know about an entirely smoke-free casino (for the reasons mentioned). The filtration systems there are far better than they were a couple of decades ago, and again, far fewer people smoke (even those who visit Vegas).
But when I go, I still want a cigar every now and again. C’mon, you’re in Vegas, that’s what you do!
RE: The Silver City example… that was in 1991. Prevalence, and public attitudes towards, smoking has shifted pretty radically since then. Again, not sure an entirely smoke-free casino would be a plus, but having more smoke-free gambling areas and bars would in 2010 be a boon for some people. Feelings change-- I remember a lot of folks in DC thinking that smoke-free laws would kill the bars; instead, it’s actually made it pleasant for folks to go there.
One last thing from the OP:
Is that at all the case? It was my understanding that Vegas abandoned the whole family friendly thing a decade ago. Back when the 1990s building boom started, you’d have casinos adding family friendly pool areas, amusement parks, mini-golf, etc., but none of it was all that profitable, and got quickly junked. This past decade the strongest years for Vegas was all built on the “What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas” model, returning to its roots as an adult playground where you didn’t bring the kids. Maybe that’ll change again since the economy out there has tanked, but I’d be surprised if they return to the business model.
All I know is, back in the early 1990s you couldn’t walk around Excalibur or the Luxor without tripping over children. Last few years the times I’ve been to Vegas I see plenty of twentysomethings, maybe even a bit younger, but actual little kids and families were far and few between.