fish oil--worth anything?

There are so many claims & rubbish out there : Is Fish Oil, as a nutritional supplement, actually of any medical benefit?

I give my dog fish oil for her skin (she seems to be an itchy girl). She had a random blood test earlier this year and my vet mentioned how good my dog’s cholesterol was. So, there’s that!

Yes, for high triglycerides and preventing heart disease. Maybe, for so many different things that I’ll just drop this link to WebMD and call it a day. http://www.webmd.com/vitamins-supplements/ingredientmono-993-fish%20oil.aspx?activeingredientid=993&activeingredientname=fish%20oil

For non-canines only, please.

(There’s one in every crowd…on the SDMB.)

Well, poop, I was going to talk about my dog as well. :stuck_out_tongue:

There is some evidence is also useful in treating depression, alone in mild cases or as an supplement with anti-depressants.

Burping or non-burping?

Fish oil must work. I never heard a fish squeak. :smiley:

So, it hasn’t been discredited?

Well, they’re getting close–a recent study indicates that the benefits the Inuit get from Omega-3 fatty acids may be based off of a genetic difference (basically, they’re mutants who had adapted to a high-fish/low-everything else diet).

From everything I just read online it seems like most of the studies didn’t show much, if any benefit from a statistical standpoint. In general from what I’ve read vitamins and supplements out of a bottle don’t really do anything, just like everything else in life it appears you can’t take shortcuts. Any supplements seem to be highly processed and this usually destroys or lessens the nutrient or mineral you were trying to obtain in the first place.

Even magnesium bisglycinate and vitamin D3?

Those are the two I’m considering taking.

You really need to contact NASA ASAP and tell them not to waste “tax-payers’ money ™” on multi-vitamins for astronauts.

Its not so much that some vitamin supplementation or specific things such as folic acid and Vitamin D doesn’t have a place, but daily multivitamins are marketed as some healthy essential and they really aren’t. Numerous studies have shown people who take daily multivitamin don’t have better health outcomes than those who don’t and may in fact be harmed. I meant to say specifically daily multivitamins in my original post, so my bad about that.

http://www.medicaldaily.com/vitamins-and-supplements-waste-your-money-physicians-say-265176

https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/more-evidence-that-routine-multivitamin-use-should-be-avoided/

Daily multivitamins aren’t the topic of the thread, though.

I think you are mistaken. Vitamins from a bottle don’t make you Superman, but they do prevent deficiency diseases, like scurvy. And while it’s true that people who eat a healthy diet don’t need them, there are many, many people who don’t eat a healthy diet. In fact, it’s kind of ridiculous to listen to nutritionists talking about people eating five servings of vegetables a day or whatever, when they’re more likely eating potato chips and Twinkies, and drinking Coke. Or in the case of the desperately poor, not eating much of anything.

Spin-off thread here.

Pretty much debunked.

TonySinclair relatively few Americans are suffering from problems related to vitamin deficiencies even they do not get RDA and even if they are eating lotso crap. More so a multi won’t reverse the harms of craptastic nutrition habits. I am big on reductionism but when it comes to food the sum is in fact more than the parts. Fish oil is a poster child for that principle. Fatty fish? Solid consensus that it is A Good Thing. Just the fish oil? Apparently not.