I noticed that as well. I thought it was interesting that one was a direct quote and the other wasn’t. It might just be a poorly written article, the author may not have gotten confirmation (or a denial) on the other line or worse, the part you quoted may not be a direct quote either (or the other line is a direct quote and was just not written well).
ISTM that since the author did talk to the principal and he did say it was about ‘gay sex’ he should have just left the hearsay line out since it wasn’t really needed to substantiate the claim.
I wonder if google cache or the wayback machine can dig up the old blog post.
Where were you when you saw it? I am 44 years old and have never seen or heard of milk being labelled or advertised or referred to as “homo milk” here in the United States. “Homogenized” yes, “homo” no. However, “homo milk” seems to be a common Canadianism for homogenized whole milk. Check out the “Tastes like Homo” label on the milk carton seen here: Homo Milk
Texas I the 60’s. Our milk had a big HOMO on it no homogenized that I remember. Of course as grade school boys we thought it the height of fun to point it out.
Terre Haute, Indiana, c. 1992. I’m not sure I ever saw milk referred to as “homo,” then or since, but I knew what the sign meant, funny as it was to think otherwise-- it was really the “gal homo” combination that made it. Lesbians work cheap in Terre Haute.
Maybe they really did lose the K, and any alternate meaning had not occurred to them. “Homogenized” may have been too long to fit in the space.