It looks as though the UK is about to ban fox hunting. I try to keep up on British politics, but I haven’t really heard the arguments for or against this very classic sport.
I’ve been a few times when I lived in the UK for awhile, was rather expensive, but was fun just for the chance to ride and to get out into the English countryside.
Back here in the U.S. I hunt fairly regularly. Squirrel, deer, turkey, and bear.
Personally I don’t really feel there is anything even morally objectionable about doing it.
Everything I kill in the woods I eat. I see no reason why it should be illegal for a person to hunt his own food. Just “because we have supermarkets” is no real counterargument. That’s like saying “we have cars, why ride a bike” or “why walk when you can ride a car?”
Now I’ll be the first to say that hunting should be regulated, and we should never be permitted to hunt endangered species or even threatened species.
But here in VA, and I know for a fact in WVa (another place I hunt every year) deer are extremely overpopulated. Both states kill about 80,000 deer a piece each year, and every year we get a news paper article about how there aren’t enough hunters to control the exploding deer population.
The problem is of course, while the appalachians are a pretty big area, there are literally hundreds of thousands of deer. Thousands upon thousands die every year because there is no food for them, there are too many deer and not enough food to go around.
One of the reasons for this problem is the fact that wolves, mountain lions, and coyotes don’t really live in the area naturally anymore. At one time they did, and they would hunt and kill deer with a good deal of regularity.
There are still plenty of black bear, but black bear tend not to hunt larger animals like deer, so they do basically nothing to control the population.
One example I know of personally occured on Blennerhassett Island. [Historical aside, this island on the Ohio river was where Aaaron Burr and Herman Blennerhassett planned to set up an empire in the west. When the plan was destroyed, so was Blennerhassett. The island ultimately became a historical area, and many of the original buildings of the Blennerhassett estate remain unchanged. The island is a truly remarkable place, and I suggest anyone in the area give it a visit]
The island basically can support about 50 deer. Well, every year the deer population approaches 200. They’ve tried the humane way of dealing with it, that is, they capture and ship the deer to mainland WV. But it does little to control the problem, and I’ve even heard some of the staff on the island say they’ve seen dozens of deer swimming back across the Ohio to get back to the island.
I don’t know what solution they are using now, but 5 years ago it was suggested the staff be given free range to hunt as many deer as they can find.
The deer on the island are extremely sickly, undersized et cetra due to chronic malnutrition.
So anyways, back to the point, I think there are legitimate overpopulation problems that can be addressed by hunting. Animals like deer reproduce fairly rapidly, a problem that wasn’t that big when they had no natural predators, now it is a huge problem.
I also agree that hunting has hurt the environment in the past, many great animals have been driven to near extinction by reckless hunting. But I think properly regulated hunting is NOTHING but beneficial to the environment.
On another note, I agree with the practice in most states of banning Sunday hunting. I’m far more a “naturalist” than a hunter and love to hike through the woods with my camera, and it’s good to have a time even during hunting season that I can do that without hearing the sound of gunshot echoing through the hills.