[QUOTE=Musicat]
You could say the same thing about MS Windows.
[/QUOTE]
Or not since it’s the operating system and not an antivirus. You have a messed up system if Windows is running at almost 100% cpu usage, which I’ve seen Norton do.
[QUOTE=Musicat]
You could say the same thing about MS Windows.
[/QUOTE]
Or not since it’s the operating system and not an antivirus. You have a messed up system if Windows is running at almost 100% cpu usage, which I’ve seen Norton do.
[QUOTE=Harmonious Discord]
Or not since it’s the operating system and not an antivirus. You have a messed up system if Windows is running at almost 100% cpu usage, which I’ve seen Norton do.
[/QUOTE]
“Their products gobble resources” = MS Windows.
There’s more to “resources” than just CPU usage.
I was having trouble with AVG on my previous desktop, so I switched to Avast. I found Avast to be somewhat non-intuative, so after running it for a bit on my new current desktop, I switched back to AVG. AVG immediately found 2 or 3 infections that Avast apparently missed.
[QUOTE=Revtim]
I was having trouble with AVG on my previous desktop, so I switched to Avast. I found Avast to be somewhat non-intuative, so after running it for a bit on my new current desktop, I switched back to AVG. AVG immediately found 2 or 3 infections that Avast apparently missed.
[/QUOTE]
However, would Avast have found any infections that AVG missed? Just trying to be fair.
I don’t like any of 'em, but if someone insists on a recommendation, I usually suggest AVG (free).
[QUOTE=Musicat]
However, would Avast have found any infections that AVG missed? Just trying to be fair.
[/QUOTE]
Good point, it may have even found more, in total, than AVG.