Are you talking about the success in having the US fight a war for them in Iraq: Or is it the current efforts to ensnare the US in a conflict with Iran? It sounds to me like the latter. Is that what you meant here?
It is really quite difficult to tell because your post is awfully light on facts, and no wonder, those are things that hardly help the zionist causes, or assist your argument. Still nice sermon, as these things go.
Israel’s predatory land seizures in the West Bank; there is, isn’t there, the tiniest difficulty in describing that as non-aggression? How did you term it?
Don’t there facts instead rather characterise Israel as an abomination?
Given the concentration of criminality and vice in its short history, the present issue, is much as furt intimates: What is the minimum retaliation for Israel’s litany of misconduct that rational, just people will tolerate?
And this point I would like to interject, with a small request to the subjects of the intensive propaganda bombarded on North America in particular by Israeli sympathisers over the past decades, if I may. While the facts of its true and aggressive nature have recently become stark and appalling, like Sam I ask that you consider its history. Doubtless many of you a filled with a terrible rage at the intense disinformation put about, which you may have believed and now find debunked. Moderate that rage please, thoughts of obliteration, the erasure of Judaism from the face of the earth, the demolition of its temples and incineration of the last Torah, while entirely natural and to be expected, these are marks of extremism and do not much assist.
Certainly, it is necessary to recognise that the network of right-wing influence that precipitated the Iraq war for Israel’s benefit is still in place and not surrendering that influence with any haste or willingness. That may be a place to start? Although addressing that problem will not sufficiently deter such conduct in future, or amount to satisfactory retaliation. The question is, what will?