Thanks. We’ve had them for a couple years now, and have yet to see anything come close. But as I mentioned, it’s counter-intuitive (to me) that there is not a competative market for people to buy their own insurance. (Note I’m trying not to pass any judgment on that here; wrong forum).
Anyway, being in the insurance industry, do you think you could check my reasoning and rationale for comparing the policies?
Among core assumption is that small things like differences in co-pay will only amount to a few hundred dollars over a year, and can be disregarded for the time being. The Big Core Assumption is that the policy premium, deductible, co-insurance, and out-of-pocket-maximum form the basis for the comparison. When looking at the policy documents and summaries, I’m not seeing any difference in coverage scope or anything else.
I got the total to be spent on medical care per plan by adding its annual premium, its deductible and its co-insurance amount. The formula accounts for the deductible before calculating the co-insurance, and checks whether the out of pocket maximum has been reached.
If it helps Excel-wise, here’s the formula I used (with apologies if it’s cumbersome; I’m not an Excel guru): IF(B$4+(($A7-B$4)*B$5)<B$6,B$3+(B$4+($A7-B$4)*B$5),B$3+B$6)
Row 3 has the premium, 4 has the deductible, 5 has the co-insurance percent, 6 has the out of pocket max, and rows 7 on have increasing covered expenses. I have two columns for each plan, one for individual- and one for the family-level deductible and out of pocket maximum.
If that is correct, then it seems as if the High Deductible 5,000 plan makes the most sense—particularly because the premium difference between it and the HD 10K plan is just about $5,000.
Aside from cash flow issues, are there major differences between HD plans and PPOs?