See, I think basic dignity is saying “You have little marketable skill, but if you come in every day, prepared for work and do what’s asked of you, we’ll pay you, give you benefits, be flexible about the scheduling, and treat you with honesty and respect. We’ll also hold you accountable – we won’t presume that because you’re still a kid in school or someone with limited education or work experience that you’re incapable of following basic rules and procedures or learning how to fulfill your job duties appropriately.”
Apparently, some people seem to be hung up on the pay that fast-food employees get. It seems clear that to them, basic dignity = more money. I think that’s a load of crap.
But even if it were true, it’s still a two way street. You want to be treated with “basic dignity” then comport yourself with basic dignity. Show up for work properly dressed, in whatever is appropriate for the job. If that means a hairnut and a name tag, wear them. Do the job you were hired to do without being a slackass and making yourself look stupid and lazy. And most importantly, don’t steal from your employer!
This isn’t about taking pride in a “shitty hamburger job” it’s about taking pride in yourself. It’s about being able to take an inventory at the end of the day and being able to say “I didn’t steal today. I didn’t slack at my job and leave more work for someone else. I treated my co-workers and bosses with respect, even though they may not have done the same for me. Today I was a good person even though my circumstances don’t make me happy.”
I’m incapable of understanding the disconnect that can produce a mindset of “I’ll have personal integrity when I’m paid for it.” You’re either a stand-up, decent person or you’re not. You’re a thief and a slacker or you’re not. Those aren’t conditions that come about as responses to your perceived treatment. We’re not talking about a homeless person stealing an apple because he hasn’t eaten in three days and has no money, we’re talking about people taking things that they know that they’re not entitled to, things that they could pay for themselves or aren’t even allowed to have when they taking them! :smack:
If your internal moral compass allows that kind of behavior, it wouldn’t matter if you were making $20 an hour instead of $5. It would just mean that you were working somewhere with better, more expensive things to steal. Instead of pocketing Tylenol and quaffing contraband soda, it’s office supplies or communications access. Example: there was a secretary who was caught walking out of my company’s offices with three reams of copier paper, an HP LaserJet toner cartridge, an electric stapler, a box of post-its and various pens, thumbtacks, paper clips, staples, etc. all jammed into her gym bag under her sweaty spandex. And yes, she was making $20 an hour. Her theft was a means to supply her home craft business office. Further review indicated that she was responsible for roughly $250 in personal long distance calls every month of her employement and was using her work e-mail address to subscribe to more than ten different Yahoo groups about her various crafts, and between the lists, daily e-mail traffic ran into the hundreds. The time she was spending on personal business at the office was mindboggling.
If companies weren’t losing money from employee theft, they could afford (or see their way clear to budget) pay raises for their employees. Take a look at Stemba’s store. Nearly $240 in employee theft daily, 45 employees, that’s $5 more each day per employee if they hadn’t been sucking back unpaid sodas and pocketing Tylenol. That’s a no brainer.
And andymurph64, I’m sorry, take a PharmD back into the office and give him a lecture on shoplifting? If you don’t understand the basic concept of paying for things you want from a store, and not taking that which does not belong to do by the time you’re of sufficient age and education to be a PharmD, you deserve to be fired for gross stupidity. Most people get that lesson when they’re 6 and they pocket a candy bar and then get marched to the store manager to confess their crime. No warning was needed. The guy was wrong, knew he was wrong, and didn’t deserve special treatment, especially in light of the employee meeting Stemba had called wherein the issue of theft was specifically addressed.