I didn’t have to hold my nose; I was happy to vote for Kamala Harris over Donald Trump and I’m happy to say I didn’t vote for the man who is dismantling decades of American progress.
I was voting for anyone who was running against Trump but a crack in the sidewalk is a higher bar than that
I don’t agree; I thought Kamala Harris was well-qualified and in any normal year might have done better. And of course in 2016, Hillary Clinton was way more qualified than Trump.
She got it handed to her running against the worst president ever. It was like an NFL team losing to a middle school JV team on what should have been a walk in the park win
How much worse she would have done running against someone even just mildly competent?
It’s tough sledding when you’re essentially running against a cult leader. She might well have defeated a “normal” Republican.
I can’t remember the last time I donated money to a political candidate, if ever. Worked for one, yes.
My point was that there was no reason to “hold your nose” when voting in the 2024 Presidential Election. Either you voted for the competent normal Kamala Harris or you freely chose to vote for chaos and the end of the American experiment.
Got a notification from my CC that my order of $19.94 from Amazon was approved. Except I didn’t order anything. Got that canceled quickly.
The last time I used this credit card was at an Amish bakery in southern Ohio.
Damn Amish Syndicate is worse than the Russian Mob!
Or you expressed your disgruntlement by voting for an alternate party or sitting out all together which helped ensure the latter.
She was seen as the incumbent, just about anyone would have lost. 2024 was a crazy year where all over the world, people were voting out incumbents primarily because they were dissatisfied with inflation. It doesn’t matter that this is a global problem that local leaders can’t solve (which is the case for many economic issues, it’s like trying to control the weather), voters aren’t often rational.
Looking at it as “Trump was bad and anyone who loses to him must be especially bad” is a pretty naive take. Democrats didn’t have much of a chance this time around and the worst candidate in history took advantage.
Maybe the election discussion is better elsewhere.
The whole griping about politicians asking for donations doesn’t belong in this thread at all, that’s the point people were trying to get across to Spiderman.
The info about the election and both-siderism has been discussed endlessly here. If Spiderman still is spouting off about it, it’s willful ignorance on his part and nothing we say is going to sink in.
I think there’s a lot of wisdom in this.
True
False
Let me contrast my 2 latest spam emails (the Democratic one being scammier than usual).
I’ll start with the one from DailyGOPnews:
From Daily GOP News, (Links removed)
[^^^ MY JAW DROPPED WHEN I READ THIS, Friend]
FIRST: President Trump announced he wants to END THE INCOME TAX.
NOW: Elon Musk wants to ABOLISH PROPERTY TAX TOO!?
[This could be the BIGGEST KNOCKOUT PUNCH the Trump Administration has delivered yet.
No more being robbed by the IRS AND no more paying taxes on your house?
Imagine the FREEDOM of getting paid your FULL PAY and actually OWNING YOUR HOME!
That’s what we call putting We The People FIRST!
But you know who HATES this idea?
The Corporate RINO Establishment
The Tax-and-Spend Democrats
The Big Government Bureaucrats
They will fight like HELL to keep control of YOUR MONEY and ABUSE THEIR POWER!!
[That’s why we’re asking 100,000 patriots like you a simple question:]
Do you support Trump and Elon’s GROUNDBREAKING TAX PLAN?
[SUBMIT YOUR SURVEY >>>]
[THIS WILL SHOCK WASHINGTON TO ITS CORE >>>]
[CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR UPDATES FROM OUR TEAM!]
Ok, now here’s the Democratic scammy one, from Stop Republicans.
Stop Republicans email (Democratic scammy org), links removed, name substituted
BREAKING: Raging Trump Rips Rachel Maddow’s Show as ‘Close to Death’[1]
[1] Rachel Maddow is a WARRIOR. She returned to MSNBC for the first 100 days of Trump’s presidency to expose his corruption!
[![RACHEL MADDOW: Donald Trump is trying to get rid of the American system of government]RACHEL MADDOW: Donald Trump is trying to get rid of the American system of government") ]
[2] Democrats need to show her support in RECORD numbers, Trump’s new administration could SILENCE her!
[3] So we are sending Maddow a MASSIVE letter to let her know that we stand with her 100% in her mission to EXPOSE Trump.
[We just need [100] signatures from California to give Rachel Maddow the support she needs to take down Trump. Can you sign before 10:00 AM tomorrow?]
[SIGN THE LETTER NOW ➞]
Dear Rachel Maddow,
Thank you for exposing Trump’s crimes and corruption again and again in the face of massive Republican pushback.
Despite attacks from Trump’s cronies, you continue showing the American public how ridiculous and dangerous the GOP agenda is.
Your show will is so important in this dark time in our nation’s history.
But I know continued attacks from Republicans could pressure you to stop attacking Trump on your show. That’s why I’m sending this letter along with other California Democrats to show MASSIVE public support for your continued crusade against Trump.
[SIGN THE LETTER NOW ➞]
I support you,
[ x. Measure for Measure]
[**** SIGNATURE NEEDED BEFORE 10:00 AM TOMORROW****]
Counting on your signature,
- Stop Republicans
[1] The Daily Beast: Raging Trump Rips Rachel Maddow’s Show as ‘Close to Death’; 1/25/2025
MSNBC is not associated or affiliated with Stop Republicans and has not sponsored or approved of this communication.
[Click here to receive fewer emails]
[![Stop Republicans]
Thank you for supporting Stop Republicans – an accountability project of Progressive Turnout Project. We’re a 100% grassroots-funded organization with a single mission: rallying Democrats to exercise their right to vote.
Ok, both were ridiculous. Both had a similar structure, with each sentence linking to an engagement website. Both had an unsubscribe button (with the GOP one being much less prominent). But the GOP one peddled fantasies really while the Democratic one had a footnote to a Daily Beast story, along with a disclaimer, and a highly dubious implication but no outright falsehoods.
Even in the land of scammy party - adjacent operations , bothsidesism doesn’t survive scrutiny. They cater to different flavors of dimwits I guess.
“Scam” doesn’t mean “aggressive sales pitch” or “message I didn’t want.” Donation requests might be spam, but they aren’t scams.
This is not a scam. Unless they aren’t actually from the group they claim to be.
Exactly. I get spam all the time but most aren’t scams.
Physicians in Kentucky are being targeted by scammers attempting to extort money and/or steal personal information. Excerpt from a Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure e-mail:
“Over the past year, the Board has even noted the scammers are employing more sophisticated tactics and have spoofed the Board main phone number in attempt to convince their target that the call is legitimate and occasionally will send documents on fake KBML letterhead. Often, they will utilize an urgent and aggressive tone, refusing to speak or leave a message with anyone other than the physician and threaten some kind of Board action or action against the physician’s DEA unless thousands of dollars are wire transferred or sent via untraceable gift card numbers or bitcoin. There have even been reports that these scammers are informing physicians that involving their attorneys will only make things worse, which certainly should raise a red flag.”
Haven’t been targeted yet, but I’m maintaining a stash of Wal-Mart gift cards to use, just in case.
I saw this one over on Reddit and can’t resist posting it, the insane legalese makes sovereign citizen stuff seem reasonable.
That’s some insane legalese, all right. Doesn’t personal recognizance (IME, it’s own recognizance; are they different?) actually mean they’re letting you go without posting bail, and the court is just trusting that you’ll show up at the appointed time?