Well, not really because I can enjoy a lot of songs that aren’t bouncy, cheerful dance music. You might be taking a much more restrictive definition of “fun” than I am.
She was talking about mainstream perceptions of gamers. Some of us have spent a long time pushing the narrative that games should be taken as seriously as books and films as works of art. That gaming is NOT an activity pursued exclusively by basement-dwelling troglodytes. And then a whole bunch of clueless basement-dwelling troglodytes show up and behave in ways that reinforce all the bad, old stereotypes. Good job, guys. Nice job. Well-played.
That’s okay. I got called a “pathetic passive aggressive gamergate apologist” once. You start to realize that some people just need to name-call and they’ll say things that aren’t really honest about you just to have an argument. But be prepared for them to defend their name calling to the bitter end. All you can do is hope that one day they grow up. 
I’m waiting for the part where you demonstrate why I should take you seriously. I don’t know if you’ve always been this way and hidden it or if you got an abnormally hard knock on the head a while back but in the past several months, you’ve been nothing but an irrelevant and sad misogynistic fool seemingly incapable of maintaining the slightest bit of cogency on any topic you set your dribbling thoughts to. So before you start castigating others for a lack of self-reflection, the mirror’s right there, Seymour, why don’t you take a gander?
Would you call Mozart’s Requiem “fun”?
We usually associate “fun” with something that’s pleasurable but shallow. It’s diverting, but not moving. It holds our attention (sometimes very tightly) but leaves us unchanged when it ends. Identifying games with fun biases design toward a more ephemeral sort of engagement, toward self-contained rule sets that avoid more challenging/deeper sorts of engagement.
So sad. You clench your vagina tight and call people the oh-so predictable misogynist/racist/Hitler while ignoring 23 pages of people insulting gamers because of the actions of a tiny, tiny, tiny few. Brava, sister!
…the difference, of course is that you were acting as a pathetic passive aggressive gamergate apologist. You cited a article that demonstrated that several years ago male gaming developers were treated appallingly by fans, and used that to state that what was happening right now to female developers is exactly the same and there is nothing wrong with that. That ignored the fact that the threats and abuse have been ramped up during gamergate, and that threats and abuse are never, ever acceptable.
My description of you was accurate. It wasn’t name calling. It described exactly what you were doing in five words.
Eh, I’d call it “enjoyable” at least which is at least in the same ZIP code as “Fun”. I don’t know if “Healing” and “Socially Responsible” can say the same.
Thanks. I literally laughed out loud.
Well, it was one post out of more than a thousand on the subject, so not surprising that you missed it. How many times has levdrakon mentioned in the last two pages as if it as if it were definitional of the whole debate? Five? Six?
…please feel free to show any of my posts that are either “femenazi” in nature or show that I’m posting to defend a specific woman so that I can have sex with them.
Nah. You can go quibble with whoever else whether or not you’re a White Knight or whatever. I’m sure as hell not going to waste my time trying to prove to you that you’re . I already got my laugh out of it.
So you admit gamers are fat diabetic losers no one will love but you’re totally not stereotyping. No. When you do it, it’s a joke. Don’t ya get it? Why can’t you take a joke, fat diabetic loser.
The law of Heathers in groups. In action. Here.
Due respect, but why the fuck would you do that? Why don’t you wait for me to demonstrate that I’m a purple unicorn that shits Mars Bars, while you’re at it?
No, when I do it, it’s self-descriptive.
You got a Pulitzer for playing games?
I got some Steam achievements. Does that count?
Not complaining. Noting so self-styled gamers can better understand why they get no respect from people outside their fraternity.
Anti-nerd? My friend, I was a nerd before you were born. I just dislike people who live a negative cliche, like the Gamergate types.
Not a jock. Not a prep. And I’ve tried watching other people play games, card, board, or video, and I didn’t hang around to be with my bros. My boredom threshold is too low. To low for gaming, too.
Faggot. BIG-> 
How about a post where you called gamers “fat, diabetic losers”?
I actually laughed at the use of the phrase “feminazi”.
What is this, the Rush Limbaugh* show circa 1994?
*. He coined the term.
The hardest part of my day is really whether I want to send my captives to the White Knight barracks, the SJW indoctrination class, or the Feminazi internment camps.
Well… yeah. Call someone a fat sexless loser and you’re being a dick. Call someone a white knight and you’re revealing that you have no respect for people of either gender and that your view of how people go about wooing women is stuck at the junior high level. As a term, it’s that fucking dumb.
You know, I agree with this. I agree that “gamers” are being tarred with a particularly nasty, overbroad brush. I think that what we’re seeing here is a small minority of ugly, nasty trolls, and that most of the people involved are generally well-meaning, not misogynists, and certainly don’t condone death threats. It pisses me right the fuck off that a label I cherish is being attacked by those in the media who can’t tell the difference between a trolling douchebag and the vast majority of people saying, “Hey, that’s not me”.
HOWEVER. It takes some fucking brass balls to say that after posting this.
Dude, this is like Richard Simmons complaining about gay stereotypes. This is like Larry The Cable Guy complaining about redneck stereotypes. This is like Ivy fucking Valentine complaining about the sexualization of women in gaming. You don’t get to bitch about being judged along a stereotype if you are that stereotype. You don’t get to bitch about gamers being attacked for these trolls because you are that troll. You’re a misogynistic, disgusting, hateful, spiteful bigot. Congratulations - you’re part of the problem. Fuck off, and leave my fucking identifier alone.
I’ll defend the identity of “gamer”. I will shout it to the fucking rooftops. Because I’m not that guy. I’m not someone who hates women, who wants this to be a boys club, who is going to be a toxic, abusive douchebag. And you’re the problem. Not Sarkeesian. Not Quinn. You.
I’ve won prize money, trophies, and t-shirts in tournaments. It’s an analogy. I realize it’s somewhat pretentious to specifically cite Sagan or Ebert, but they were the first who came to mind. Cut me some slack.