Gay Issues Seem Like A Boring Sideshow To Me

[Evil_Captor]

@MsWhatsit

You figure that rescuing the banks and the auto industry = “ignoring jobs”, huh?

Interesting.

At any rate, you are setting up a ridiculous scenario in which all problems must be addressed in strict order of priority, and we may not move on to the next problem until the first one is “fixed.” When the problem to be “fixed” is something as large and complicated as the economy, it’s a bit silly to suggest that we shouldn’t do anything else – like, say, work on improving civil rights in this country – until it’s “fixed.”

You can certainly make a legitimate point that overall, economic issues are more important than gay rights. What is not legitimate is the suggestion that we cannot address gay rights until our economic problems are solved. We can, and in fact, have addressed both.

Show me the program Obama put forward specifically to address job growth. I’ll wait.

[Evil_Captor]

@DianaG

Yeah, I hate petty, selfish people who can’t see that having their civil rights trampled is nothing compared to MY problems.

I want you to look up Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and think about it. Then get back to me.

[MsWhatsit]

@Evil_Captor

Show me the program Obama put forward specifically to address job growth. I’ll wait.

Explain to me how rescuing two major industries has no effect on jobs.

I won’t wait, though, because I have errands to run today. I may check back in later, though. (Since we’re apparently giving updates on what we will be doing after we submit our posts in this thread.)

[Really_Not_All_That_Bright]

@Evil_Captor

Show me the program Obama put forward specifically to address job growth. I’ll wait.

I suspect nothing short of Obama personally hiring some maids or something would be enough for you… but here, knock yourself out.

[DianaG]

@Evil_Captor

I want you to look up Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and think about it. Then get back to me.

Reflect on the concept of “civil rights” and tell me how (or why) you expect the government to meet any of your other needs if it can’t be bothered with them.

[Banquet_Bear]

@Evil_Captor

As for priorities … some guy or gal, gay or straight, who is struggling to keep his home and to keep his family going after losing his or her job has problems that are ORDERS of MAGNITUDE bigger than Tim and Ted who can’t get married and are still employed. Maybe I’m way off base here … but I think YOU are the one who is way off base.

…13000 people lost their jobs because of DADT.

Now that DADT is being removed: thousands of jobs will be saved.

Why do you not support Obama’s job initiatives?

[Skald_the_Rhymer]

@DianaG

Reflect on the concept of “civil rights” and tell me how (or why) you expect the government to meet any of your other needs if it can’t be bothered with them.

Moreover, consider that persons disenfranchised by the system have little to no incentive to cooperate with the larger society if the injustices wrought upon them are forever being ignored as low priority. Admittedly this applies more to the 60s Civil Rights movement than to same-sex marriage, but I see little reason why gays should forever be told to wait till next year when the prohibition of their marrying is so manifestedly wrong.

[Steve_MB]

@What_the

I’m talking about the masses, particularly the younger potential voters

Sounds like the GOP had better update its positions stat before it gets swept into irrelevance as its voters die off and get replaced by the new generation.

[What_the]

@Steve_MB

Sounds like the GOP had better update its positions stat before it gets swept into irrelevance as its voters die off and get replaced by the new generation.

That is indeed a challenge. Fortunately everyone get’s older and wiser.

And remember, you only had one chance to run the first black presidential candidate who will make the world love us again. The kids and others who tend to vote with their emotions will never have that chance again.

[Richard_Parker]

Naming post offices consumes about as much time and political capital as gay rights in Congress.

Perhaps the OP is confused by the double entendre “stimulus package.”

[jebert]

Boring Sideshow?

Let’s hope we come to the point where gays are fully accepted and they have no more issues to be concerned about. Then it will truly be a boring sideshow.