It also feels good during anal sex. You can ejaculate from your penis (not simply an orgasm but a really really good orgasm) from a good prostate massage. What is its primary function “supposed” to be?
OK, let me start by saying I’m not a fan of gay people, and I don’t think its natural.
Natural in the way that animals were born to reproduce, nobody teaches animals how to have sex, its instinct, so gay people are born kinda mentally retarded (there has to be a better way to say that) because they don’t have desires to further the species…yes they could father children, but they aren’t attracted to women.
That’s my opinion, feel free to shoot me down 
Thanks.
Let’s see. Humans are animals. Nobody teaches humans (animals) how to have sex, its instinct, so gay people are perfectly natural; else how did the first one learn to do it?
O_o
It ain’t instinct to have sex with men…if you’r e a man
Shows what you know. When I see a handsome, muscular guy, I have as visceral a sexual response as you would if you saw a busty, wanton nymph. My response is most definitely instinctual and wholly out of my conscious control. Now why this is so, I have no idea.
**ICP9991 wrote:
Natural in the way that animals were born to reproduce, nobody teaches animals how to have sex, its instinct, so gay people are born kinda mentally retarded (there has to be a better way to say that) because they don’t have desires to further the species…yes they could father children, but they aren’t attracted to women. **
So you’re saying that the only reason for sex is procreation. If so, any time you have sex for other than procreative purposes, it’s unnatural.
How many children do you have?
Sex is only natural if it isn’t done correctly. 
That’s funny, every gay woman I know is attracted to women.
All I have to say is unnatural for who ?(or is it whom?)
Leaving aside definitions, just because something is unnatural, doesn’t make it wrong; just because something is natural, doesn’t make it right.
Hi-jacking the thread slightly, I’ve never understood why some people are so keen to prove that homosexuality is or isn’t genetically based (or influenced). Neither way would prove it right or wrong. If it is proven that pedophilia could be caused by genes, that wouldn’t make it right.
“Homosexual behavior exists, not merely in humans, but in several animal species as well and therefore it’s natural. The question I suppose we must ask is, Is homosexuality harmful or benign?”
gobear, could you expand on this a little? What animal species practice homosexual behavior other than the human animal? I’m just curious about this because I’ve never heard this before. Thanks.
Mammie, homosexual behavor has been observed in hundreds of other species, especially mammals. There are exclusively gay sheep, monkeys, dogs and dozens of other mammals. Here is a link which talks about it.
Thanks, Diogenes. I must have led a sheltered life. 
Don’t forget the penguins in the Central Park zoo.
Oops, not Central Park, Brooklyn someplace.
Not only is it unnatural, it’s evil!
(Mmmm… evil…)
Esprix
[Is it time to change my sig back yet?]
(warning: mild hijack)
Doesn’t this rather contradict with supposed onmiscience? Why would a god need to conduct an experiment to observe what he purportedly already knows?
<hijack>
Kegg, if you can replace “whom” with “him” in the sentence and have it still be correct, then you’ve chosen correctly. If not, it’s “who”.
</hijack>
Good question, Kelly. I’m not out to erect philosophical constructs which one must accept dogmatically and uncritically; I’m commenting on hypotheses regarding an entity that I know and follow. Nonetheless, the paradox you identify is much like “the stone that He can’t lift” – it involves an accepted self-limitation: “If I as God create entities with free will, self-awareness, the ability to experience the consequences of their actions, and limitations on what they can know and do, then I may learn something new about the nature of existence that I by Myself cannot know, because My sole frame of reference regarding it is My omnipotent, omniscient Self.” Sounds like grist for a new thread, if you want to pursue it.
BTW, the God I believe in does not regard gayness as inherently sinful, merely a condition to be dealt with morally or not, like a tendency to be abrasive, to be introverted, to drink too much, to spend time (perhaps too much time) on the Internet, etc. – you deal with it and choose what behavior seems right to you.
The penguins were, I believe, in Prospect Park Zoo in Brooklyn.