Not a single person in this thread has defended changing babies on the table, and the OP never said that’s what he had seen. He was complaining about merely sitting a baby on the table.
Don’t crap where you eat. It’s right up there with the golden rule, and if not it should be.
Well, he said it had a dirty diaper. If it’s just in a dirty diaper on the table, that seems pretty gross.
Plus, runner pat WAS complaining about changing a baby where food is prepped.
I’ve never seen that bucket. Therefore I do not believe you.
How would he know it was dirty?
And nobody has defended that.
If it smelled like shit?
I caught campylobacter once, no fun. Anything that reduces the risk of that makes sense to me. Just say no to asses on shared resaurant tables even if the kid is just sitting on it . I worked in restaurants, tables aren’t sanitized they’re just wiped down. The restaurant I worked in would of told the parent to take their kid off the table and keep him/her in the high chair.
Don’t like it ? No soup for you get out.
He didn’t say it smelled like shit.
Well, go back to posts 3 and 4. Runner pat says, “I once reported a grocery store when I saw the owner changing her baby’s diaper on the meat counter.” You respond, “reported the store to who for what?” That seems to imply that you think there was really nothing wrong with that situation, and certainly nothing to report to the health department. Reasonable people would interpret this as you thinking it’s OK to change a baby where food is prepared, which is obviously pretty stupid and something that you’re now denying.
Situations like this make it appear that you take deliberately antagonistic and unsupportable positions in arguments and then back off and lie about your original meaning. Obviously, that would be douchebag behavior, and since you’re not a douchebag, I thought you might want to know what’s making people think you are one.
I never said it was ok. That is not a reasonable interpretation of my words. It’s not something I am “now denying.” It’s something I flat out never defended.
Oh, that’s right - I forgot that Dio is just posting tongue-in-cheek! That explains a lot. 
The baby in the second picture is wearing more than a diaper. A lot of people see kids wearing diaper covers or onesies think they are looking at a baby in a diaper.
Hey, man, I was just trying to help you understand why you look like a douchebag. Obviously, you already understand and that’s the look you’re going for. Forget I said anything.
Doesn’t mean it didn’t.
I’ve seen it too, here in The Valley. It’s the heat that is the deciding factor. The heat in August here is brutal.
Flowers in spring time?
You know who else didnt smell like shit?
Hitler!
And I don’t his ass on or at my table either…
I’m not sure why you think this is a great defense – if you’re not trolling (and I believe you when you say you’re not), the only other option is that you’re a threadjacking attention-whoring retard.
Seriously, you’ve been doing this more and more lately and it’s annoying as fuck. Waltz into a thread, make a bunch of absolute statements about how things are (dismissing all posts which claim evidence to the contrary as wrong or untrue), and now the rest of the thread is the Diogenes Show.
Just shut the fuck up, you blowhard moron! If you want to whack off over the glory of your ineffable rightness, get a blog. You can even put a mirror in front of the computer so you can pose and admire your awesomeness between posts.
Where do you all live that you are seeing all these diaper-only clad children sitting on tables? I can’t recall ever seeing that in a public eatery. Is it a southern thing?
I also got the sense that the open did not mean soiled, but rather had a hyper dainty impression of any children wearing diapers.
What about teenage girls sitting on tables? I’ve seen that way more often. Is that an epidemic too?
That all depends. Has he been eating the Uber Colon Blast Burritos again?