An update to a thread from several months ago, The not-so-wonderful thing about Tigger…
The case sounded fishy from the start, and I have to say I’m happy with the result. The whole thing’s been a pretty bad time for the defendant, though.
Interestingly, the jury’s decision was not based on whether the costume allowed enough mobility to fondle someone, which many were debating in the earlier thread, but rather that there was no way of proving that Chartrand was the one in the costume when the alleged fondling happened.
Also interesting that Chartrand’s lawyer was a Tigger, too.