:smack:
The thing is, the ADA only requires organizations to make reasonable accomodations for disabled persons. So even if this were actually a service animal (which it’s abundantly clear it ain’t), the school would only be required to allow her to bring it to class provided it wasn’t disruptive to the other students and further provided that they had no other alternative available to accomodate her special needs. Small chance of non-disruption with a ferret in class scenario. Service dogs (and other animals) are trained rigorously - and part of their training is not to be disruptive. Causing a disruption for the entire class for the sake of a single student is not reasonable. In cases where the disruption is tied to the physical presence of the student (as in cases of Tourette’s, for example), the school could well choose to accomodate by providing the student with video tapes of the lecture and a pass from the professor that allows the student not to attend class in favor of watching said tapes. Or have a streaming-video setup for the student. My law school had a streaming video setup for just such a reason. We had a student who was unable due to disability to attend lectures without causing disruption, so the school just set up streaming video, informed the professors of the situation, and had the student attend virtually. If the student hadn’t liked that option (in fact, he suggested it and the school agreed), that would have been too damn bad. The school was approached by a student with a disability, made provisions to accomodate the disability reasonably, and the student declined the provisions - no bad on the part of the school.
The long and short of it is that as long as an accomodation offered is a reasonable one, you don’t really get to pick it out yourself. You can offer your own alternatives, but the school is under no compulsion to choose one you offer. Nowhere does the ADA state that the disabled person is the one who gets to decide what accomodation they’re getting. As long as they come up with a reasonable accomodation, the school they can tell her (or anyone) to take it or leave it. Schools do not even* have * to allow service animals, provided they are willing to offer an alternative. See above mention of taped lectures available to a student. (This would of course not apply to a laboratory science kind of class - but this girl doesn’t sound like she’s involved in a hard science curricula that requires lab work.)
The school cannot be required to allow her to have it in the dorms (and shouldn’t - for lots of reasons). This is because she has options for housing other than university housing and, frankly, the school is not obligated to provide any student with a place to live. True, most schools do, as a convenience to their student body, but it’s not an inalienable right for college students to live in student housing. Ask any of the students at my alma mater who were not granted student housing and had to find off-campus accomodations or choose another institute of higher education.
If she cannot get through the educational experience without access to her ferret, then she is free to live off campus and have the fuzzy there. Or live at home and attend as a commuter (if not to that specific school, then to one within commuting distance - again, nobody has the right to attend any specific university - hell nobody has the right to attend university at all). If she requires a service animal to get through her day, then by all means she should rush out and get an actual service animal. My sympathies to all sufferers of her conditions, but she’s being unreasonable and the whole situation smacks of drama queen.
As to the reasons why the school is totally reasonable in prohibiting animals in the dorms (regardless of whether or not people have actually had animals in the dorm without causing trouble), some of them are as follows (and previously mentioned):
-
Damage. Even well-trained animals can and do damage property. It only takes one bathroom “accident” for example to pretty well ruin a carpet. Many smaller pets (ferrets, rodents, etc) are notorious for chewing.
-
Aroma. No matter how scrupulous you are about cleaning up after your beloved pet, there’s going to be some with mammalian pets. This aroma can be and often is bothersome to those nearby.
-
Speaking of those nearby, a dorm is a communal living situation. There are likely to be *several hundred * other people sharing your space with you. All of whom are entitled to have their disabilities accomodated - including severe allergies, phobias, anxiety disorders centered around pets, etc. My dearest friend has severe allergies to pet dander - if it’s furry, it’ll make her hive up like a honey farm and leaves her gasping for every breath. Why is ferret-girl’s inability to stand college without her ferret more important than my friend (for example)'s inability to breathe around her ferret?
-
Slippery slope. No matter what people think (and I find it exceptionally disingenous for people to assert that there won’t be a problem with “Well Jane got to have her ferret, my disorder will be soothed by my cat! I have a note from my doctor and everything!”), once you allow one resident to have an animal in the dorms, you’ll wind up with lots of animals in the dorm. Many schools do not allow even recognized service animals to live in dorms. They freely allow them on campus, but not living in the dorms. They are generally willing to bend over backwards to find suitable housing to accomodate students that require service animals, though. All three of the colleges I attended had arrangements for persons requiring service animals that did not include living on campus. The accomodations were generally comparable to the dorms, just as close to campus as some of the student housing, and generally equivalent in all ways. They also arranged for student financial aid to cover as much of the housing as it would have covered for a student living on campus.
Basically, disabled or not, this girl is unreasonable. Her case has no merit. She’s wasting the time, energy and resources of all parties involved. Including her own.