Whoa, got a link? I gotta read that!
Argent_Towers:
Guess what, all of you anti-gay fanatics and Bible-thumping morons? Your Bible is a fag bible, created by a fag king. (If that isn’t a fag king, I don’t know what is a fag king.) Yes, King James was a fag. He loved nothing more than to fuck his young, handsome male servants and courtiers. He fucked Robert Carr, who was his “gentleman of the bedchamber” (FAG!) but his greatest love was George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buttfuckingham, er, I mean Buckingham. He wrote letters to him containing passages like this one (seriously) :
Sweet child and wife? Dear dad and husband? Looks like there was more than just a FAG relationship going on there, but also a leather-daddy thing too. Praise Jesus! God bless the King James Bible!
There was even apparently a secret hidden passage that was recently discovered, linking the bedrooms of the King and his boy-toy, in the country-house in which the two of them lived together. It was widely known even in the fag king’s own day that he spent far more time with his male homosexual lovers than with his own wife. A contemporary poet, Théophile de Viau remarked:
And yet…James "adopted a severe stance towards sodomy using English law. His book on kingship, Basilikón Dōron, (Greek for “Royal Gift”) lists sodomy among those “horrible crimes which ye are bound in conscience never to forgive”. He also singled out sodomy in a letter to Lord Burleigh giving directives that Judges were to interpret the law broadly and were not to issue any pardons, saying that “no more colour may be left to judges to work upon their wits in that point.”
For God’s sake, he wasn’t just a fag, he was a closeted fag.
You guys are going to have to come up with a new bible. Maybe the Fred Phelps Version?
note - I obviously don’t have anything against gays…my use of the term “fag” here is just a takeoff of asshole Fred Phelps’s obsession with the word
The word FAG appears ten times in this post.
bup
August 21, 2009, 6:32pm
24
In *your *post, it appeared eleven times.
No, you’re wrong - you missed the one in the disclaimer .
DrDeth:
King James didn’t write the King James Bible, you ignorant troll.
Other than a better translation, with much better Shakespeare-like language, there’s not a lot of difference between it and the Bishops Bible.
And, there’s not much difference, other than modern language, between the KJV and later translations.
I don’t think we’re in Kansas anymore.
Giles
August 21, 2009, 6:51pm
28
Certainly not: King James had never heard of Kansas, and wouldn’t have wanted to go there if he had.
mswas
August 21, 2009, 7:00pm
30
I think that if it weren’t for homos throughout history with their increased free time due to not having a family to support, we wouldn’t have much religion at all honestly.
Only on this board would someone count the number of times the word “fag” appeared in the OP, and another person would follow up to check his work and correct him.
We put the “anal” in “anal-retentive!”
Wait, was that a gay joke?
Miller
August 21, 2009, 7:36pm
33
No, it’s just going through a phase.
Algher
August 21, 2009, 7:38pm
34
You know how I know you’re a fag? You read the King James Bible.
Yes, but he wasn’t trying to blow up Parliament for a lark.
Shodan
August 21, 2009, 7:50pm
36
Your post said “blow” twice.
Regards,
No, he was holding out for a Benson & Hedges. Or at the very least a Marlboro.
Again with the fags. :smack:
Giles
August 21, 2009, 7:57pm
39
No, he was part of a plot to overthrow the Protestant governments of England and Scotland. Does that make it any better?
Proverbially, it makes him the last man to enter Parliament with honest intentions.
