As the points I’m making do not require that, yes, you are just using a straw man, you are still attempting to deny that you originally said that liberals can not do wealth creation. Attempting to say that the liberals I mentioned do not count because they were capitalists, is moving the goal posts and then you are still setting the straw man that we liberals are saying that no capitalist can be a liberal, no one has said that here but you.
And you still continue to demonstrate that you are an idiot by assuming that we could not notice what you are doing.
As history shows, there were even conservatives that realized the old deal was going to lead to revolution, and then no one would know what to expect, history also shows that you never know what leaders one would get after the shooting stopped.
And so we got the New Deal, an idea to prevent communism and fascism from setting shop in America.
Just to clarify, you are so dumb that you don’t notice what is the problem, I’m referring to your ignorance of even the simplest logical fallacies in the book.
Screw those Dems, they are the scum of the earth. The Republicans should vote to change the quorum % to one less and then pass the bill without the Dems.
Actually, I am not entirely sure. As a general rule, though, rule changes require a higher order of consent than a simple majority.
Your post speculating about the origins of the recent plague that has befallen us is somewhat interesting, I went there and poked it with a stick. Mostly harmless. But I do recognize several of the names, however, that does not explain how they got to be sicced on us. I note with approval that at least one of them has a kicking rack of ginormous jigglys. Our own message board does not support the display of physical attributes. More’s the pity, perhaps.
And “zero moderation”? Well, there’s a problem, no? Without the Luminous Ones, who sit at the right hand of The Cecil, our level of pristine intelligence and civility would not be possible. (Grovel, grovel, kissy, kissy…)
