When should we follow this word by 'to"? Does it matter if it’s being used as an adjective rather than an adverb?
I would never say “near to”, but I very much want to say “nearer to” and “nearest to”.
As a comparative adjective:
1a) I live near the river.
1b) Steve lives nearer [to] the river.
1c) Jane lives nearest [to] the river.
Using “to” sounds better (necessary, in fact) if the compared subjects are both included in the sentence:
1d) Steve lives nearer [to] the river than I.
As comparative adverbs:
2a) The oak tree fell near my house.
2b) The oak tree fell nearer the fence.
2c) The oak tree fell nearest the fence.
I think the thing that screws me up is when I try to define “near” as meaning “close to”, in which case we should never need to add “to” after any of the above examples because it’a already implied in the definition of “near”.
The actual example I’m dealing with is a student’s translation from a foreign language news report about the recent CT elementary school shooting:
(This is an ESL student, so don’t be too shocked by the errors.)
I cautioned the student about using the phrase “close to” when talking about two people, as it can be taken in a sentimental way. I am also trying to get the student to make better use of comparative adjectives and adverbs, so I suggested using either “closer to/closest to” or “nearer/nearest” the violence.
As you have probably already guessed, the student asked me why I omitted “to” after “nearer/nearest”. I fumbled around in the dusty grammar rule books in my brain and could only come up with: because it feels wrong. This answer is never satisfying to an ESL student.
So what do you think? Is it regional? A style choice? Either/or is correct?