Maybe the funeral of Queen Victoria? Maybe it ought to include emperors and tsars and others: noble monarchs, crowned heads of state, etc. What’s the most number of them who were ever in one place and time?
There may not be any real solid single answer, but… I was curious.
(“Last night at the poker table” is good, but…y’know, real people.)
May 1910, where you expect a lot of crowned heads before they lose theirs in The Great War. I counted only 9 Kings but lots of princes and grand dukes (along with their queens, princesses, and duchesses.) Death and state funeral of Edward VII - Wikipedia
Wow! The first link says that Queen Elizabeth the Second’s diamond jubilee had more royals than at any time since her coronation; that sort of implies the coronation was an even larger event in this regard. Wow!
(I Googled, but didn’t get anything useful. Are there places that teach how to Google effectively?)
There would have been more members of royal families, but monarchs generally don’t attend each others’ coronations. There were a few kings or queens at Elizabeth II’s coronation, but they were all of British protectorates like Tonga.
The OP is not well-defined. Do you mean monarchs or people with royal titles? Or perhaps monarchs plus their consorts? And if you mean people with royal titles, specify which titles. And do claimants to a throne count or do they have to be actually in office?
I vaguely recall reading about a trip of some British monarch to India during the Raj, which was a big deal, and there was an event which pretty much all Indian royalty attended, but I can’t seem to find any details on Google, so I don’t know if my memory is accurate.
Do you actually know anything about the topic at hand?
The list of crowned heads who were present at Queen Elizabeth’s jubilee seems a little spurious. It included the Kings of Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, and Yugoslavia - none of whom are recognized in their own country.
My guess would be there must have been a gathering at some point when there was much more fractionalization, a la the Holy Roman Empire, where you could conceivably have 20 regents within a few hundred miles because there was no Germany, just a king of Bavaria, etc.?
Grin! Exactly! As I said at the outset, there may be no single real answer. I was hoping for something helpful and plausible – “Why, the Congress of Vienna had seventeen” – but, sure, obviously, what are the definitions? My Venn Diagram maker doesn’t have that degree of resolution.
I was aiming for “heads of state” – head honchos and big cheeses – who were more hereditary than elected – thus emperors and tsars are good – and who would have been recognized as “royal” or “noble” or “monarchic” by most of the others in the group, preferably by the biggies: England, Russia, France (when they had Kings) etc.
I was told there were some at Nelson Mandela’s funeral, but can’t seem to Google a meaningful list.
Thanks! That’s what I was thinking of. So, there were approx. 562 princely states in the British Raj. If most of the Indian royalty attended, then we could be looking at 500+ monarchs gathered in one place.
That’s cool! And it shows my foolish Eurocentrism: I wouldn’t have thought to include Indian Royalty. The fault is definitely not in my stars but in myself, that I am a chauvinist. I will include this event in my list of nominations for the event best fitting my question.
Thank you, not only for the answer, but for helping expand my limited horizons.
I imagine that when Elizabeth II passes, the funeral will involve an impressive collection of world leaders, perhaps more than was present for Mandela’s funeral.
Those 500+ maharajah automatically lost their kingly and autonomous status by recognizing an overloard. Allow me to present a more definitive contender:
Says who? You? I seriously doubt you’ve done even five minutes of research into the legal status of these kingdoms, so spare me the lectures. :rolleyes: