How, in the name of all that is Holy, could that have been enough to convict anybody???
I certainly hope that there is more to this. I mean, it looks a little like the jury didn’t need any evidence to convict. His name coming to her in a dream is one step above her picking names at random from the phone book.
No DNA? This trial was in 1986. DNA testing was available!
I mean, if you have a dozen people that say you were 1000 miles away when a crime occurred, that ought to be enough to not even charged, shouldn’t it??? It doesn’t if the Sheriff’s Deputy and Federal Corrections Officer were among the dozen. But if they were, why did they even prosecute this guy?
But hell!
Witness against him changed her story, defense wasn’t notified of the inconsistency.
Alibi witness came forward 21 years ago, says Johnson was somewhere else. Still imprisoned.
The shooter admitted he shot the guy 18 years ago and said Johnson wasn’t there. Still imprisoned.