Ruh roh radaher. Does this change your mind in any way whatsoever?
I’m guessing no, but I’m ready to be pleasantly surprised.
No question about, in light of this most recent revelation, Dan Rather must be fired.
What is the frequency, Kenneth?
That is not the break the McCain campaign has been waiting for. 
adaher: Really? Worst thread you ever saw…Well, my next one will be better. Hello? Hello?
Spiking the ball when you haven’t scored yet is so unbecoming. 60 Minutes stands by their report, and while the discrepancy between what he told his employer and what he told 60 Minutes is something that needs to be straightened out, it does not debunk their story, which in any case relied on a lot more people involved with what happened that day than him.
But I’ll humor you for now. What did he say that you believe to be untrue about what happened that day, aside from his being there? Did he say anything particularly damning? or are you using him to distract from the other truly damning things that were revealed by 60 Minutes?
Lara! No! What have you done?
I’ve been decieved by a beautiful woman. I feel like… every guy in the history of ever.
Ah, I get it. The President gets the benefit of the doubt because the American people didn’t read the fine print on his promise, but Lara is a liar because one of her sources wasn’t on the up and up.
The only thing these two stories have in common is you. It wouldn’t be fair to hold that against either story because you’re just a fucking moron.
That’s because you need to defend your double standard. A lie is a lie. In one case, a person said something they knew was not true, in another case, a person was misled by a bad source.
So defend your double standard, rather than evading the issue.
Ironically, you’re the very kind of person liberals end up having to save from the consequences of his own cognitive impairments.
And they’ll do it by any means necessary, as we’ve seen.
I suppose sometimes the ends don’t justify the means.
snip
Scored? From what I’ve seen, that pretty much sums up everything anyone needs to know about your motivation in any discourse Ads. Screw truth and common sense.
You continually vomit forth these selectively ingested pieces of garbage in the slight hope someone from “the other side” slips on it.
Ever occur to you we’re all on the same “team” ?
Ah… that would involve having an actual independent thought process, not a prepackaged, mad hatter talking point. Forgive me, I ask too much.
Being deceived by a homely one isn’t any better.
All Ms Logan needs is guidance and direction from someone of mature judgement and a generous nature. Happily, these are qualities I have in abundance. So, dibs.
Rachel Maddow will get over it. Besides, she’s a lesbian, so I can save money on all that surgery.
Don’t think I saw you respond *in any way *to the ‘list of embassy attacks and lives lost under the Bush Presidency’ post. (#86)
How many under Bush, and how many under Obama? Or didn’t you pay attention to this vital issue when Bush was Prez? And why not?
There are two chances that adaher will respond to this post, slim and fat.
Oh, I think he might respond. He just won’t likely address it with any integrity. It bugs me when I see a good post like Elvis’s ignored.
Ad’s interest lies in stirring up shit clouds, not answers.
He may occasionally try and fake some integrity, but if he can’t slant it or obfuscate it, he really has no interest.
After all these years, I finally have a sig line!