Gun calibres

Slow day at work. I’ve been reading computer game reviews and I realised I have no idea what the various gun “numbers” bandied around mean. From the context, I infer that a .22 is a smaller gun/bullet than a .45, but is it half the size? What about a .303 rifle? Is that somewhere in between like in decimals or is it 6 times bigger?

What about aother terminology, such as thirty ought six (.30-06?) Where does metric come in a la 9mm, 7.62mm etc. It seems to graduate on to mm later on (105mm cannon 155m artillery pieces). How do these numbers relate to stopping power?

Any enlightenment would be appreciated.

Cheers,

Docklands

First, a good link or two:

http://www.firearmsid.com/A_bulletIDcal.htm
http://greent.com/40Page/ammo/45/45-advoc.htm
http://www.sightm1911.com/Care/45acp.htm

.22 calibre is about .224 inches in diameter, and a .45 is about .451 inches. Visibly speaking, they don’t even look similar. But an entire .22 shell, including case, fits inside one of my .44 magnum shells, which should give you an idea of relative size.

Stopping power is a very complicated subject, and others who are more knowledgeable will be happy to expound upon it.

Without getting into the inevitable great debate on stopping power, let me say that what is called “stopping power” or “knockdown power” is mostly imaginary. Tests by the NRA, FBI, and various labs show that it just ain’t so. That is, a bullet, even one transferring 100% of its energy to the target (usually presumed to be an attacking human) lacks the energy to knock it over. The way one brings down an attacker instantly is to hit the CNS: the brain or spinal column.

Also be aware of the idea behind bullet energy: IIRC, the energy of a bullet (or other moving object) is equal to its mass times the square of the velocity. Doing the math, you’ll see that making the bullet fly faster increases its energy much more than increasing its weight. This is why the various “magnum” cartridges exist; they have more propellant (gunpowder) to make the bullet go faster.

Lastly, caliber by itself in not really an absolute measure of what the bullet can do. You know about the little .22. But the standard NATO rilfe caliber (as in the M16) is .223. Does this mean the NATO caliber is just a tiny bit better than the little .22? No. First, the .223 bullet itself is heavier (it’s longer then the .22 bullet, though it is almost the same diameter). Second, the .223 bullet is attached to a case (the brass thing that holds the gunpowder) which is much larger. Again, this increase in propellant makes the bullet much, much faster. This is something to consider when you hear of pistol and rifle calibers; .30 caliber is considered pretty decent in a rifle, but .32 caliber is considered weak in a pistol.

Well, 155mm cannons have lots of stopping power.

Anyway, English caliber measurements are generally the diameter of the bullet as a percentage of an inch. .22 is .22 inches, .45 is .45 inches (the actual precise measurement can be off a bit, and the number can be rounded for naming purposes).

Calibers developed by metric countries tend to carry a metric measurement - like 9mm parabellum. The US military uses metric for it’s official designations, and so .223 is 5.56mm in army terms.

As for big guns, as they’re strictly a military thing, and don’t have a ‘common name’ (.223 as opposed to 5.56), they’ve always usually been named in millimeters. The exception is heavy british artillery - I don’t know if they still do it, but back in ww2, their big guns were named by caliber - 4.5" guns, 5.5" guns, 8" guns, etc.

Cool links Anthracite.

Cheers guys.

Those links are blocked at work Anthracite, but I will check them out at home.

Cheers guys.

Those links are blocked at work Anthracite, but I will check them out at home.

Arse!

On the subject of ‘stopping power’, One must realize that the various theories have very partisan adherants, many such adherants are religious in their ferver. This is not too surprising when one remembers that these men are trusting their lives with the choice they’ve made. Under those conditions you must believe you’ve made the best possible choice…

Now: RII, or Relative Incapacitation Index, has been largely discreditied, as has “Stopping” or “Knockdown” power. Real-world shooting results have the advantage of empiricism, but they’re clouded by the myriad factors involved in a human gunfight, including the psychological state of the combatants. Further, real-world shootings simple enough to even begin to decipher are relatively uncommon.

Still, these results do serve as a semi-useful backstop for theory. Dr. Martin Fackler, himself quite partisan, seems to have the best handle on the “whys and wherefores” of bullet function. To date, the best, most workable theory indicates that, barring a CNS hit, it’s the size (depth and volume) of the perminant wound channel that is the most reliable indicator of rapid bullet lethality. Essentially, a handgun bullet must be able to reach it’s target, penetrate that target, and then perform work inside the target, in the form of tearing and disrupting tissue and bone. Bullets don’t cut, they crush. They crush deep holes, dislocating tissue, tearing organs, muscle, and bone apart. Fast bullets tend to create large temporary wound cavities, but unless they hit a bone and redistribute their energy by way of secondary fragments, or hit relatively solid tissue (like the liver), the large temporary cavities don’t contribute much towards lethality, and represent much ‘wasted’ energy. Slow bullets tend create small perminant cavities and small temporary cavities, and further, tend to not create secondary fragments if they strike bone. Medium velocity bullets tend to create larger perminant cavities than slow bullets, and tend to ‘waste’ less energy than fast bullets.

All other factors being equal, the larger the bullet, the larger the perminant wound cavity. This can be achieved by using large fat bullets, or bullets that expand, or a mix of the two.

In general, any handgun bullet larger than about .35 inches, moving at a velocities larger than 800fps can be counted as a fairly reliably lethal bullet. Of course this is greatly simplified, and totally leaves out such factors as bullet shape, expansion, and bullet placement (to name just a few factors).

Rifle bullets are another story entirely…
To start, they have so much energy, in many cases, that they can turn temporary wound cavities into perminant cavities by the mechanism of stretching flesh so far that it tears. Not all rifles can do this, mind you, and even those that can do so, don’t always actually do so. Next, rifle bullets tend to be heavier (in most cases - not always!) than handgun bullets, and almost always are moving very fast, so tend to do greater amounts of work inside their victim. Rifle bullets, if so designed, also expand more reliably, and to greater extents than pistol bullets. Often, rifle bullets actually breakup and send fragments throught the body, even if that wasn’t the design intent. German 7.62mm NATO and American 5.56mm NATO are particularly notorious for this.

Also, IRT “Caliber”, there is another use… In Naval guns, a “caliber” designation after a bore diameter listing tells you how long the weapon’s barrel is, in multiples of the bore diameter.
Ex: 16", 45 caliber gun (US “Colorado” class battleship) would have a barrel 45*16" long, or 720 inches, or 60 feet long.

To add to the confusion it’s common for European calibers to be designated by bore diameter while US calibers are designated by the slightly larger groove diameter. This difference is typically only a few thousands of an inch but is quite significant when you’re squeezing a bit of metal down a grooved tube with upwards of fifty thousand PSI force. Typically the bullet is the same diameter as the groove though there are some small variations and pure leads bullets are typically a thousandth or two bigger. For example thirty caliber in the US is a .308" bullet and groove diameter. A wide variety of caliber designations such as .308 Winchester, 7.62 NATO, 30-06 Springfield, 30-30 Winchester, .307 Winechester, .300 Savage, .300 Weatherby Mag and .300 Winchester Mag all use .308 diameter bullets. 7.62mm is exactly 0.30" but 7.62 NATO is in fact just the military designation for .308 Winchester. .303 British uses a .311" diameter bullet and groove diameter as does 7.62x39 in the AK-47.

All the above replys are factually correct. I will only elaborate just a little bit. You asked about designations such as .30-06 etc etc etc. For the .30-06 the .30 designates the bullet diameter (others above have shown actual bullet diameters) the 06 designations indicate the year that particular round lost it “wildcat” designation. Meaning the round was officially picked up by one or more of the major gun/ammunition manufacturers. Without going through a big long history of caliber develepment suffice it to say that “wildcat” calibers where not widely used by the general populace. Now you also have rounds designated by numbers like 30-30, 45-70, 32-30 etc etc etc. These are so designated because they where originally black powder rounds the first 30 being bullet diameter the second being the powder load weight in grains.

This is all I have time for hope it helps some.

Please excuse spelling

To answer another part of your question, when you have another number after the caliber (30-30, 30-06, etc.) it means one of the following:
A) the year it was introduced (the 30-06 was released in 1906)

or (which seems more common)

B) the weight of the powder in grains (45-70, 45-90, and 45-110 all use the same bullet, just have a larger case for more powder). Usually this is found for cartridges that were developed using blackpowder, as opposed to modern smokeless powders.

To muddy the waters still further, some of these (like my Model '94 Winchester) have made the transition to modern smokeless powders, and the powder charge number is no longer a sure guide, as the charge might be (depending on bullet weight, desired velocity, and powder choice) much higher, or much lower.

Docklands, it helps to think of ‘calibers’ as names instead of an exact measurement. Caliber literally means diameter in hundreths of an inch for small arms, but even then is usually written in decimal form (normally someone would write ‘a .45 caliber pistol’ even though they’d say ‘a 45 caliber pistol’). In practical terms, the numbers are a rough estimate of the diameter of the bullet - a .45 bullet is about .45 inches around, a .22 is about .22 inches around. This only refers to the size of the lead bit at the end (the specific meaning of ‘bullet’), rifle cartridges with a few exceptions (.22 long rifle as the big one) use a much larger brass case that is necked down to fit the smaller bullet; a .30-06 cartridge is much larger than a .38 special cartridge, even though the actual bullet is narrower. As Anthracite mentioned, these aren’t exact measurements and can be taken in slightly different spots. While .38s would seem to be larger than 9mms, they’re actually about the same size as the .38 was arrived at by measuring case diameter. The mm/in split comes from where the cartridge originated and who made it.

There isn’t any sort of rule for switching names and it’s generally more of a marketing decision. For example, while the generally accepted rules for naming rounds changed between the .38 Long Colt and .38 special, the .38 special wasn’t named the .357 special because they wanted it to be associated with the .38LC (you can fire .38 LC rounds out of a .38 special, .38sp was really the next step up), but the .357 magnum wasn’t named the .38 magnum because it used such a higher pressure that they didn’t want people confusing it with the older .38s. The standard naming for NATO rounds is IIRC [diameter]x[case length in diameters], so a normal 9mm round would be a 9x19, while the smaller makarov cartridge would be 9x18.

Rifle rounds come from a variety of sources; there’s usually a normal caliber in there and something to do with case size or the blackpowder load (generally you don’t use black powder today, but the names stay around). .30-30 IIRC was originally a .30 cal bullet fired with 30 grains of blackpowder, and you’ve got others with similar names like the .30-40 Krag. I forget what the -06 in .30-06 is, it might have meant 6 times as much powder as the bullet weight but I’m not real sure.

Artillery is now listed by metric sizes, but in the past the US and UK would name artillery in inches or pounds (for the size of the shell), like the 8-inch gun, 2-pounder, etc. Inches and pounds stuck around for both through WW2, though using metric names became more common. Sometimes artillery sized aren’t literal diameters; the USSR would have, say, a 55mm tank gun and a 56mm mortar, both with the same sized bore. This helped prevent confusion, as getting a truck full of 55mm mortar rounds for your 55mm anti-tank guns was not really pleasant.

‘Stopping power’ is a term with a lot of sketchy and pseudoscientific research around it, in general the more powerful (in terms of KE) a round the more stopping power it can be said to have.

While we’re on the subject of calibers, we should mention “gauge”, the standard measurement for (most) shotguns.

Shotgun gauge is measured by a relatively quaint standard: the gauge number indicates how many lead balls fitting the size of the shotgun’s bore would equal one pound. So, “a 12-gauge shotgun” means that 12 lead balls of the diameter of the shotgun’s bore would weigh a pound. This means, of course, that the lower the gauge number, the larger the bore is.

The biggest stuff you can find commonly today is 10-gauge. The most common, I reckon, are 12- and 20-gauge, though you can also find 10, 16, and even 28 gauge shells without much difficulty.

As with damn near everything, there is an exception: the .410 shotgun, whose number indicates the bore measurement.

Oops… Left out important info:

" …my Model '94 Winchester, chambered for .30/30… "

The .30 US/30-06 never fit the common definition of wildcat. It was orginally designed in 1903 for the new Springfield bolt action rifle and in 1906 the standard bullet was changed and IIRC a minor dimension change in neck length. Commercial rifles were designated 30-06. Commercial ammunitino is not bound by the same restrictions as military ammunition. The military specifies bullet type and weight so that there will be consistency in trajectory so that sights can be calibrated accordingly. Commercial ammunition might be designated the same caliber but have a variety of bullet weights and types.

Wildcats are modified calibers that are not availble as military or commercial loadings. Eventually some lose that status as they become popular and commercial ammunition is made. A good example is the 7-30 Waters, a 30/30 Winchester case necked to 7mm. This first became popular in Thompson Center Contender single shot pistols.