Guns in the home - where do you stand?

No unauthorized entry, lived mostly in cities, no firearms and no expectation of ever using one, and no kids in the house.

I just don’t see the point. There are other things I can do to protect myself, and if I’m out of options, well, I’m out of options and I don’t really think a gun would help me anyways. I doubt I’d ever be able to pull the trigger even if faced with some of the doom-and-gloom hypothetical burgler/rapist/murderers presented in threads like these.

I honestly get creeped out at the thought of people having guns next to every door of their house, or always within 10 feet, or carried on them to get milk at the corner store. It just seems so paranoid to me. I don’t want to live that way.

I just like to shoot targets, so I’ve got several guns. I do have a short, loaded 12ga. by my bedroom door though. I would feel stupid to have that many guns and then be held at gun point or worse.

I agree, the thought that it would upset someone else that someone they don’t know has something they don’t like is very sad.

:smiley:

40, female, have lived in crappy parts of a large city (Minneapolis), in suburbs, and in a rural area. Currently in the Chicago suburbs. Never had anything stolen, no attempted break-ins even. I was sexually assaulted by an acquaintance, but a gun wouldn’t have helped in the particular situation.

My husband has a rifle-barreled shotgun for hunting. I don’t even recall where he stored it. I think I know where there is or was ammo stored. It’s not a priority or concern for me. (We have no kids.)

What you’re really saying is that you value an ornament which cost ~$100 over a human life? I think I may begin to understand why USA is the only Western country where the death penalty is actively enforced.

And seriously, if I felt the need for never being more than 3.048m away from a loaded gun in my own house, I’d either move to another neighborhood or get an appointment with a psychiatrist. But I guess it takes all kinds…

I win again.

24/f/mostly rural Canada.

Never had a home invasion.

No firearms in the house, probably never will be unless I end up marrying someone who likes hunting.

Grew up with unprotected guns in a closet with bullets on the top shelf. Never ever had a desire to touch any of them. The machete interested me more. :smiley: :wink: Guns were used to kill passing coyotes and annoying magpies.

Even now in the city, I’d maybe consider a taser if they were legal. I should probably pick up a purse-sized thing of pepper spray, but I don’t even know if that’s legal, and it wouldn’t be for protecting my home, it’d be for the rare times I have to venture out somewhere skeevy.

I feel secure where I live. Even in the violent parts (and I live in the city that used to have the most violent neighborhood in Canada) it’s all knife violence. Guns don’t even ping my radar. And gasp I’m a single female!

Saskadope in North Central, anyone? Come on, Cat Whisperer, y’know you wanna visit!

We’ve never had an unauthorized entry, and I’ve lived mainly in the suburbs/small cities most of my life.

I believe the chances of my family/children being endangered by guns in our house are greater than the chances of a violent attack in our home, so it’s precisely because I value my family’s safety that we have no guns.

#3 is bullcrap. Criminals are responsible for their crimes, not previous victims. As a good citizen it would be my duty to do my best to identify the criminal and testify at the trial, if any. That’s it.

#4 - any evidence for that assertion about Phoenix, that isn’t anecdotal? Just wondering, because when I tried looking it up it seems there aren’t statistics on that, because “home invasion” is not what people get charged with.

#5 - is that the gun-owner’s version of Pascal’s Wager? I’m not sure I agree with it, in any case. Having guns, needed or not, can lead to gun accidents.

I’m still trying to remain neutral on this issue, at least for the purposes of this thread, but there is something disagreeable about your post, whiffs of excess testosterone or something.

Just for fun, here’s a further anecdote: long after I had left home, my father had two guns in the house - a .22 target pistol, and a Glock (9mm, I think). In the last few years of his life, he was too week to even chamber a round in the Glock, but he still thought of it as some kind of safety for himself (who had never been robbed or attacked or anything else, as far as I ever knew). At one point he offered it to me, and I said no thanks, because I didn’t know how to use one and I didn’t want to have one around in that case. When he was dying, and before I got there, he asked his neighbor to take the gun from the house because he was convinced that I hate guns. For the record, I don’t hate guns, I simply have no experience with them.

Roddy

I have mostly lived in small towns, but even in a place that was for quite some time literally “America’s Safest City” we had someone try to break into our home. Fortunately our dog scared them off.

My attitude of it is that there’s a very good chance that I will never be the victim of a home invasion. However, if I happen to be one of the unlucky few, whatever happens will be done and over with long before the police get there. If you think the police can protect you from criminals you are sadly mistaken, and perhaps more than a bit naive. Even at best it can take police 5 to 10 minutes to respond. That doesn’t sound like much, but it doesn’t take very long for someone to break in, hurt you, grab a bunch of your stuff and leave. A friend of mine died exactly that way. Some idiot broke into his house, stabbed him, and stole a bunch of tools. A neighbor heard the commotion and called the police, but my friend was dead long before anyone arrived. They did eventually catch the guy, but that won’t bring my friend back.

Despite that attitude that I have, I don’t really use my guns for protection. They are mostly a hobby, though I ended up checking the target practice option instead of hobby option because the hobby option indicated that they don’t get fired, and I shoot mine fairly often. I do shoot mostly reproduction weapons that are replicas of guns made in the 1700s and 1800s, but they are pretty much exact replicas made with modern machinery instead of being made by hand (which actually makes them a bit different from the real ones because they don’t have the crappy hand filing and beating parts that didn’t fit into submission that you see on real antiques). Let’s face it, a Model 1756 British Infantry musket is hardly the ideal weapon for home defense. However, it must be said that a 5 1/2 foot weapon with a .75 cal. barrel sure does look impressive if someone points it at you, so it would probably make someone think twice. My muskets may be ancient style one-shot weapons that take half a minute to reload, but they were military weapons once upon a time and they are more than capable of killing a person.

I don’t keep my guns loaded. It’s not practical. Unlike a modern gun, once you load a musket you can’t unload it (at least not easily). So, if someone broke in I would have to very quickly unlock the box I keep the powder in and also very quickly load one of the muskets (which is about impossible to do very quickly). If I didn’t have the time to do that then I’d have to point an unloaded musket at the bad guy and hope that it’s large size would be enough to scare him off.

The one nice thing about old style muskets is that you don’t just stick a bullet in them and pull the trigger, so I don’t have to worry about my kids getting into them and hurting themselves or someone else. I do keep the powder and bullets/balls locked up, but even if the kids somehow got into that I don’t think they could figure out how to make the musket actually go bang.

I have absolutely no problem with other folks who keep guns in their homes, whether for self protection or hunting or whatever, as long as they are responsible about it. I also respect people who don’t want anything to do with guns, though I don’t like it if they try to force their opinions on others.

I am also of the opinion that there are a lot of folks out there with a distorted view of gun owners, and a rather unhealthy opinion about guns themselves, fearing them as if they are things of pure evil. I grew up in an atmosphere where guns were perfectly acceptable and weren’t feared, but you had to be responsible with them. I think that people who don’t understand what it means to be responsible with a gun have no business owning one. Note - I’m not trying to start a hijack or a debate here, just trying to explain my attitudes about guns and the reasons behind them since that is what the OP asked for.

ETA: 44 year old male here, married with 3 kids living at home.

Huge multiple answers here. I have two guns in the house - a tactical shotgun for home defense/hunting and an M1 Garand for future hunting/target shooting purposes.

I have a 10 year old who stays with me weekends. I keep the guns locked and unloaded while he is here, and much of the other time (because I forget to unlock them).

I’ve never had unauthorized entry here, and nor do I really expect it. But there was a double murder-suicide at the business across the street, and my gf did disturb a break in at another business there - I felt more comfortable with the shotgun on my lap waiting for the police to arrive.

I also live very close to some very high risk targets - I’m in Northern VA, just outside DC, very near the Pentagon and National Airport. If the terrorism shit does hit the fan, which I stress I don’t expect, and law and order breaks down even temporarily, I have no intention of being a victim if I can avoid it. My choice of weapons doesn’t guarantee me anything, but it does tilt the odds a little towards me if things get ugly.

And, most importantly, Max Brooks describes the Garand as the number one weapon of choice for the upcoming zombie apocalypse.

Yeah, and you make life harder for those of us who are gun owners who don’t seek confrontation at ever step along the way. And you make it more likely we will suffer stupid restrictions on own ownership. Thanks a bunch.

“Compromising” with the antis never accomplished anything but nibbling our rights away, so thank you and the horse you rode in on. It wasn’t until we became militant (thanks largely to Clinton’s AWB) and started pushing back that we did anything but lose. I’ve been part of this game since the 70’s and I’ve seen what wins and what loses. Making nice means take somebody uncommitted to the range and let them burn some of your ammo. The antis are a lost cause and making nice with them is, at best, pointless. Confrontation with them, every step of the way, is what has made nearly nationwide CCW a reality, prevented the reinstitution of the AWB, and numerous other victories. You be genteel if you want, I’ll concentrate on getting back more of what we lost in previous eras.

Your definition of militant is “I’m doing this to piss people off.”

My definition is fighting things in the courts to defend mine, and your, second amendment rights.

Which of us has had more success? Because I’ll give you a clue - even with this Court, if Heller’s lawyers had stood up and argued that Heller’s right to own a firearm was based on pissing of the gun control brigade, we’d have lost.

Unfortunately to you, posing is more important than practicality. You are the epitome of the guy who views guns as a penis substitute, an image that responsible gun owners have fought against with varying degrees of success. It’s because of people like you the AWB passed in the first place, because no one listens to people like you when explaining that a bayonet lug doesn’t make a gun more dangerous. Instead they listen to people like me. Provided people like you shut the fuck up.

Give Scumpup a break. I’m sure he’s more than willing to politely explain his views with anti-gun folks; convincing skeptics just wasn’t the point of post #26, insomuch as I can tell. Persons who support legislation like the mercifully expired assault weapons ban are extremely frustrating to some of us. It’s perfectly acceptable (and imho, laudable) to own an AK47 solely because it pisses some ignorant people off. Why not buy one of the guns most likely to be the next on Congress’ chopping block?

Good on you, Scumpup.

The Godwin of gun threads strikes again.

I politely and respectfully suggest that you might, at some time in the future when your schedule permits, lightly place your incisors upon my epidermis and lightly apply pressure.

OK, boys, that little hijack over? Can we get back to the thread now? Gracias.
Roddy

After reading a previous post, I tried to find a place in the house where I was more than 10 feet from a loaded firearm. I couldn’t do it. :smiley:

Well, I keep my guns all together in my bedroom, but then, I don’t think there’s a spot in my apartment anywhere where I might be more than 10 feet from a deadly weapon of some kind. My swords, my quarterstaves, my bo, my bows, kitchen knives, screwdrivers, my fairburn-sykes combat dagger (a great ritual dagger if there ever is one)…