My friend was in a relationship with a shitty dude for a few years, had a kid together, and just split up in September.
A year or two ago they bought a double wide together. Rather, she supported him through a personal injury lawsuit, the proceeds from which he used to pay for the trailer. So he paid, BUT, they both signed their names to the title.
After they break up, come to find out, he forged her name (she saw a copy, it was a terrible and obvious forgery of her signature) to transfer sole ownership to himself.
She would press charges if there was a chance she could get her half of that trailer back. But if not, she’d rather he not go to jail so he can continue to work and she can go after him for child support.
Yahoo answers and “askalawyer.com” type sites have apparently told her she has no chance of getting compensated because he “paid” for the trailer, title forgery or no. I can’t possibly see how that is correct, hence why I came here.
I think she should press charges. The worst that could happen is a criminal gets the justice that’s coming to him. It’s a pretty open and shut case that he did it. GIVEN that he is successfully prosecuted, will he have to give back the half of his house he stole from her?
In the general case, if I forge some documents, or embezzle funds, or just straight up rob someone at gunpoint, and I’m subsequently convicted, do I have to pay it back? What are the relevant legal differences between these scenarios?
Am I right that regardless of who actually handed the money over, ownership is decided by whose name is on the title? Or else what are titles for?
(I understand, you’re not my lawyer, et cetera and so forth. I’m just looking for general factual answers regarding the law.)