Cellphone We didn’t get to see anything, which made it so much the better, but Hayley discovered the evidence she wanted to find under those rocks and in the hidden safe.
Yes, he was the rat bastard, hence the ending
Wait a second. I have not seen the movie, but are you saying that she found evidence that satisfied her without showing the audience? Because, if that’s the case, you still only have her take that he is a “rat bastard,” something she came in believing if I understand the plot.
He means that we saw her find the evidence, but didn’t actually see her perform “the procedure.”
It’s a dark film, for sure.
At the end, it’s unambiguous.
Thanks Kalhoun and Trunk for the clarification.
Without giving to much away I can’t really say anymore. I would recommend you see the film
I was surprised to find exploitive in my hardcopy Websters. OTOH, orientate is in there, too.
I don’t know if I would say I enjoyed the film, but I am glad I watched it. Just like The Woodsman, it is disturbing.
A great film. And infinitely more disturbing. I recommend this film to people and they frequently don’t appreciate it, but not because it isn’t good.
Sort of like Mysterious Skin?
Wow. That looks like a good flick. I hadn’t heard of it until now, but I’ll be sure to give it a look. Thanks!
I don’t know if I’d go so far as to call it torture porn — I think the movie has some legitimate ambitions over and above a typically reprehensible entry in the genre like, say, Chaos — but nevertheless I didn’t really care for it. More than anything, I thought it was about twenty or twenty-five minutes of interesting material, padded out to unnecessary length in order to make it into a feature. It would have been a pretty good short, I think. By stretching it the way they did, they introduced all sorts of plausibility problems that could have been avoided by skipping through the gobs and gobs of extraneous plotting and focusing on the theme. (How the heck did that tiny little woman hang that guy from the ceiling? Come on.)