He is taking an awful risk by letting Harry grow and learn so much. The two of them even had that conversation about what not to do as an evil overlord, though I don’t remember if they specifically mentioned not killing the hero when you have the chance. It’s pretty high on the list, though, of what not to do.
Meh, we’ve been set up for a reversal for quite long time. It would have affected me more if I thought it would be permanent. This version of Harry will not lose to the sworn enemy of the Potter House.
Anyone know when the next (and presumably final) story arc will begin? I’m chomping at the bit!
By the way, I found a page with a bunch of fan theories, one of which I really love (spoiler boxing just because it’s a crazy theory):
When Harry first shows up way back in chapters 1 and 2, people ask him “Are you Harry Potter” and he responds with something like “well, I have no reason to believe otherwise, people have been telling me that since I was little”. Clearly that just sounds like him being his slightly obnoxiously pedantic self. But it could also be a massive-in-plain-sight clue that he is NOT in fact Harry Potter. That Harry Potter, the blood son of the elder Potters, did in fact die, and the character Harry Potter that we’ve been reading about this whole time, who grew up thinking he was that son, is in fact… something else. Most likely, a part of Voldemort, with Quirrell being another part.
What a wild, intriguing theory. I may have to go back and reread in that light.
According to someone on Reddit (yes, I know that’s not a formal cite), we’re getting two interim bits and then the final arc starts…guesses are that it would start in April or May.
Actually, speaking of Reddit, there are lots of intriguing ideas there…I got lost a bit perusing them the last week or so.
I understand that hope, but I really don’t see any other way it can be dealt with. Harry is not going to have to just accept what happened, as that’s exactly what all the irrational, non-loving people do.
And I don’t see Harry losing, either, as the purpose of the work is to promote rationality, not to condemn it.
And while I would love a hero’s sacrifice, that doesn’t fit the rational framework either. Like it or not,
Harry, with his intelligence, is worth more alive than Hermione.
Finally, the author has said that the story will not have a twist–that he will not ever actively try to deceive the readers. If something appears to be true, it is true.
So, unless someone can find something I’m missing or a flaw, I really think what I said is going to happen.
I read this fairly early in its development, and only got up to chapter 45 or so.
So, I am anticipating what happens next, but I am rereading it from the beginning.
I remembered some of the really remarkable stuff from the early chapters but I had forgotten how good the rest of it is. I wish this author had a proper editor and a publisher. She deserves to be known for her work.
But, at least she gets to see what folks think about her work, which is the first thing I think of as an artist, the acclaim. That may be puerile, but I have sung songs that made people come to me afterward and thank me, and I am almost as proud of that as I am for my computer work.
The author is a woman? I thought it was a man. Was I mistaken? (I haven’t read the story for a long time–I think I stopped about halfway in and just never got back into it.)
He’s a man named Eliezer Yudkowsky. Methods is written under the pseudonym Less Wrong, but his real identity doesn’t seem to be a big secret. It’s even mentioned on his Wikipedia page.
I started reading a week ago after reading this thread and am finally caught up now. I love it it! It went through some ups and downs but it’s definitely ramped up as it’s gone along.
It may help that I’ve never read the books and therefore didn’t have to learn a new way of relating to the characters, so I wasn’t jarred by any reinterpretations of their character.
If we go with the idea that Harry represents a burgeoning artificial intelligence–one that is trying to be ethical–that might work.
But I just don’t see the author, after going to such lengths to say how evil death is to then switch to the idea that it is acceptable. And that’s what he’d have to do to have that more poetic ending. Either Harry would accept it, or the world is doomed because Harry couldn’t accept it–both communicating that death is acceptable. Though I admit that the more recent updates make that last scenario seem more and more likely.
Also, doing my best to keep this thread spoiler free since we’ve got some new recruits who may want to post. Heck, that’s why I’m resurrecting the thread. (For spoilered text like I included above, put [noparse][/noparse] around any text you want to hide. A thread full of spoilerboxes isn’t great, either.)
how far into the original series is this so far? I’ve downloaded a PDF file of 1633 pages and it’s up to chapter 95. I’m up to 15 and am downloading the podcasts as I go.
Or have I asked a non-question? It appears to parallel things in a general way and I assume there’s still a theme of Harry vs Voldemort.
Yes Harry vs. Voldy. But as I’m seeing it everything happens including the upcoming final showdown compressed in the first year. The author is dropping all sorts of references and things we learned in the next six years (books) backwards into the 101 chapters released do far. He said in the author notes after chapter 101;
The story currently has one more one-shot update left to go,
and after that the long final arc which will wrap everything up with no loose ends,
which I fondly hope to get done before the end of 2014.